Skip to content

Onchain Language #834

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2024
Merged

Onchain Language #834

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

idalithb
Copy link
Contributor

-updating on-chain and on chain to onchain

@idalithb idalithb requested a review from a team as a code owner December 11, 2024 21:16
MichaelMacaulay
MichaelMacaulay approved these changes Dec 11, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@MichaelMacaulay MichaelMacaulay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are CRUSHING IT - great work! LGTM

benface
benface approved these changes Dec 12, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@benface benface left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

<3 on🔗

@idalithb idalithb merged commit 26027b9 into main Dec 18, 2024
4 checks passed
@idalithb idalithb deleted the on-chain branch December 18, 2024 22:15
idalithb added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2024
@idalithb
Revert "Onchain Language (#834)"
7afe44b 
This reverts commit 26027b9.
@idalithb idalithb mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@benface benface benface approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@MichaelMacaulay MichaelMacaulay MichaelMacaulay approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@idalithb @benface @MichaelMacaulay