Skip to content

Conversation

@AlexandreCarlton
Copy link
Collaborator

In a similar vein to graphql-java/graphql-java#3565 which enabled "strict mode" for type wiring (preventing multiple DataFetchers being registered to the same field on a GraphQL type), we add "strict mode" to the DataLoaderRegistry so that we don't accidentally register multiple DataLoaders to the same key (which would result in the last registration winning). This can prevent confusing bugs from emerging.

This defaults to false to avoid breaking changes, and deliberately mimics the referenced PR to maintain consistency.

In a similar vein to graphql-java/graphql-java#3565
which enabled "strict mode" for type wiring (preventing multiple
`DataFetcher`s being registered to the same field on a GraphQL type), we
add "strict mode" to the `DataLoaderRegistry` so that we don't
accidentally register multiple DataLoaders to the same key (which would
result in the last registration winning).

This defaults to `false` to avoid breaking changes.
Copy link
Member

@bbakerman bbakerman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Move the strict check in nameAndInstrumentDL as a common place and all the registering methods will then be covered

if (strictMode) {
assertKeyStrictly(name);
}
dataLoaders.put(name, nameAndInstrumentDL(name, instrumentation, dataLoader));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You need to cover org.dataloader.DataLoaderRegistry#computeIfAbsent as well

I think this code would be better put in the nameAndInstrumentDL method as a common place

The following is all the places it is called

instrumentDLs(Map<String, DataLoader<?, ?>>, DataLoaderInstrumentation)
register(DataLoader<?, ?>)
register(String, DataLoader<?, ?>)
registerAndGet(String, DataLoader<?, ?>)
computeIfAbsent(String, Function<String, DataLoader<?, ?>>)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done - as agreed elsewhere, I've omitted computeIfAbsent since this repeated invocations to the same key will not override the DataLoader with strict mode off.

I did have to make nameAndInstrumentDL to get access to strictMode and the DataLoader map, however.

This is done to ensure coverage of all registering locations.

We purposefully omit `computeIfAbsent` as this does _not_ register a new
DataLoader if there is an existing key.
Copy link
Member

@bbakerman bbakerman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

@bbakerman bbakerman added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Nov 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants