Add rule GCI108 #411
Add rule GCI108 #411
Conversation
|
Hi @kiiro52o2, could you :
|
| @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ | |||
| { | |||
| "title": "Comparison between XGBoost and RandomForest", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
could change title to give information about the real good practice and note a global title with no good practice to follow.
Maybe something like "Use XGBoost instead RandomForest" ...
|
|
||
| == Metrics Comparison Table | ||
|
|
||
| [cols="1,1,1,1", options="header"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sorry but I don't understand how you do your tests ... could you give us more information on your testing context, please ?
|
|
||
| XGBoost not only matches or exceeds the accuracy of RandomForest but also runs significantly faster and emits less CO₂. | ||
|
|
||
| == Visual Comparison |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
in your different graphics, you show several frameworks ... could you explain why do you choose XGBoost instead of RadomForestClassifier ... and not other framework ? only based on your array with metrics ?
for example, seeing your graphs ... HistGradientBoosting or ExtraTrees are not so bad, no ?
|
This PR has been automatically marked as stale because it has no activity for 60 days. |
3 participants
Comparison between XGBoost and RandomForest