Filter extension for in-memory copy with OLF #154
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
jonenst
approved these changes
Nov 15, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In order for the in-memory copy to work, we have to ensure that the extensions copied in memory are present in the classpath. Anyway, only a subset of extensions are required for the security analysis with OLF. That's the list OPENLOADFLOW_SECURITY_ANALYSIS_EXTENSIONS.
To do that, I took all the extensions from OLF and filtered them for the copy.
Unfortunately, the NetworkSerde.copy() API does not have the option to pass the extension filter as parameter so I forked the method from powsybl-core.