Skip to content

Conversation

klesaulnier
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

LE SAULNIER Kevin added 4 commits September 9, 2025 10:55
Signed-off-by: LE SAULNIER Kevin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: LE SAULNIER Kevin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: LE SAULNIER Kevin <[email protected]>
private LimitViolationType limitType;

private long acceptableDuration;
private Integer acceptableDuration;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like we converted to long related sorting/filtering. I can't see why?
4f7a3f8

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After some tests, it's still working as expected, I can't find why it's ben done

@antoinebhs
Copy link
Contributor

antoinebhs commented Sep 10, 2025

Looking at the recently implemented code, I think we could have used LimitViolationUtils.checkTemporaryLimits() ? It checked quickly but the logic looks similar to what we implemented?
@EtienneLt

Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@antoinebhs antoinebhs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code OK
Test OK

@klesaulnier klesaulnier merged commit 01ef152 into main Sep 15, 2025
4 checks passed
@klesaulnier klesaulnier deleted the overload-durations-in-result branch September 15, 2025 08:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants