-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Support strided Load/Store in SVE2 #8888
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
stevesuzuki-arm
wants to merge
7
commits into
halide:main
Choose a base branch
from
stevesuzuki-arm:pr-strided_ls
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+62
−144
Open
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1b02720
Support strided Load/Store in SVE2
stevesuzuki-arm 7e58a59
Modify test cases of load/store in simd_op_check_sve2
stevesuzuki-arm 68e0cd2
Merge branch 'main' into pr-strided_ls
stevesuzuki-arm 8010bb2
Skip load/store test for SVE2 with old LLVM
stevesuzuki-arm f499310
Fix load/store tests in simd_op_check_sve2
stevesuzuki-arm 16de509
Merge branch 'main' into pr-strided_ls
stevesuzuki-arm f4b7033
Skip load/store scalar in simd_op_check_sve2
stevesuzuki-arm File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Skipping this test is a red flag. We can't degrade codegen quality on supported LLVM versions, especially not across all released LLVM versions. That test (and perhaps this patch) should be adjusted to confirm superior codegen on LLVM >=22 (or more broadly), but it must also confirm the existing behavior on LLVM<22.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the feedback. I've updated so that test scope before this PR is kept with old LLVM. The test cases enabled by this PR are performed only with LLVM >= 22.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would suggest to remove the scalar load/store test by the reason below
In addition, this is not a test for SIMD. The previous one looked like passing but with false-positive.