Skip to content

Conversation

@schmichael
Copy link
Member

Port the fix from hashicorp/net-rpc-msgpackrpc#15

For consistency only. To the best of my knowledge no HashiCorp tools use this code. They only use the serialization code from this package and all use hashicorp/net-rpc-msgpackrpc for RPC.

Also add @hashicorp/nomad-eng to CODEOWNERS as in hashicorp/go-sockaddr#75

Team will also need repo write access.

@schmichael schmichael requested a review from tgross February 7, 2025 22:36
@schmichael schmichael requested a review from a team as a code owner February 7, 2025 22:36
Copy link
Member

@tgross tgross left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@tgross tgross merged commit 3655d07 into main Feb 20, 2025
4 checks passed
tgross added a commit to hashicorp/net-rpc-msgpackrpc that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
Update go-msgpack to pick up the bug fix described in
hashicorp/go-msgpack#26, which mirrors the work done
here in #15
tgross added a commit to hashicorp/net-rpc-msgpackrpc that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
Update go-msgpack to pick up the bug fix described in
hashicorp/go-msgpack#26, which mirrors the work done
here in #15

Also bump go version for CI to a supported version.
tgross added a commit to hashicorp/net-rpc-msgpackrpc that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
Update go-msgpack to pick up the bug fix described in
hashicorp/go-msgpack#26, which mirrors the work done
here in #15

Also bump go version for CI to a supported version.
@schmichael schmichael deleted the close-on-error branch February 24, 2025 18:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants