SRE-197, SRE-198, BE-233: Add reusable GitHub Action for ECS service redeployment

[TimDiekmann]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Create a reusable GitHub Action for ECS service redeployment and extend deployment workflow to include staging and production environments.

🔍 What does this change?

• Creates a new reusable GitHub Action redeploy-ecs-service that handles ECS service redeployment with optional role assumption
• Adds environment variables for staging and production environments in EU Central region
• Refactors deployment jobs to use the new reusable action instead of direct AWS CLI commands
• Extends deployment to include staging and production services for graph, type-fetcher, kratos, and hydra

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

🛡 What tests cover this?

• Workflow execution in GitHub Actions

❓ How to test this?

1. Merge the PR
2. Verify that subsequent backend deployments successfully deploy to all environments
3. Confirm that services are properly redeployed with the new action

---

Note

Adds a composite action to force ECS redeploys and updates the backend CD to redeploy multiple staging/production services; switches healthchecks to /health and enables the graph test server build; adds Sentry “staging” env.

• CI/CD:
  • New Action: Adds /.github/actions/redeploy-ecs-service to force ECS service redeploys with optional role assumption.
  • Workflow Updates (.github/workflows/hash-backend-cd.yml):
    • Replaces inline AWS CLI redeploy steps with the new action across jobs.
    • Adds env/config for EU Central staging/production clusters and services (app, graph, type-fetcher, API, kratos, hydra, workers AI-TS/integration, temporal) and redeploys them.
    • Passes ENABLE_TEST_SERVER=yes when pushing the graph image to artifacts ECR.
• Graph/Test Server:
  • Adds /health route and updates healthchecks to target /health in server.rs, test_server.rs, REST openapi_only_router, and test-server routes.
  • apps/hash-graph/package.json: include ENABLE_TEST_SERVER build arg in docker build scripts.
• Telemetry:
  • Adds Staging variant to SentryEnvironment and updates its display.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit f02c9a1. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[TimDiekmann]

• SRE-197, SRE-198, BE-233: Add reusable GitHub Action for ECS service redeployment #8169 👈 (View in Graphite)
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 57.84%. Comparing base (6274897) to head (f02c9a1).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/mod.rs	0.00%	7 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8169      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.85%   57.84%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1167     1167              
  Lines      109264   109266       +2     
  Branches     4976     4976              
==========================================
- Hits        63210    63208       -2     
- Misses      45308    45312       +4     
  Partials      746      746              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.16% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.24% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	49.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.46% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	83.78% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 146 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.903 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 113 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.073 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 113 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.109 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 169 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-37.726 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-66.119 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-47.908 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.096 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.701 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.414 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.159 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.364 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.171 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.796 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.653 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.314 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.91 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$38.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 147 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$85.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 432 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$43.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 207 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$53.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 320 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.834 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$39.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 141 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.657 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$498 \mathrm{ms} \pm 855 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.392 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 420 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$82.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 300 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.957 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$314 \mathrm{ms} \pm 675 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.048 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 94.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.348 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.796 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 150 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$29.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 313 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.873 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.716 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$28.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 352 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.301 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.011 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.151 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 339 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.641 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$30.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$57.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.650 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 373 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.162 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$63.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.181 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$73.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 366 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.204 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$82.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 367 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.305 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$89.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 398 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.235 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$54.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$83.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$61.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 234 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$69.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$72.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 300 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$72.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$149 \mathrm{ms} \pm 602 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$142 \mathrm{ms} \pm 500 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$43.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-58.535 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$582 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.21 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph