H-5737, H-5851: Bump transitive Cargo dependencies

[TimDiekmann]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Update dependencies in Cargo.lock to their latest versions.

cargo update --ignore-rust-version --recursive

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

🛡 What tests cover this?

• Existing tests should cover these dependency updates

❓ How to test this?

1. Checkout the branch
2. Run the test suite to ensure all tests pass with the updated dependencies
3. Verify that the application builds and runs correctly

[TimDiekmann]

• H-5737, H-5851: Bump transitive Cargo dependencies #8203 👈 (View in Graphite)
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 58.77%. Comparing base (ec0c785) to head (af4a073).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8203      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   58.77%   58.77%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1189     1189              
  Lines      112425   112425              
  Branches     5010     5010              
==========================================
- Hits        66074    66073       -1     
- Misses      45593    45594       +1     
  Partials      758      758              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.14% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	46.65% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	87.53% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[cursor]

PR Summary

Massively updates transitive Rust dependencies, introduces objc2-related crates and other new deps, removes some legacy build deps, and aligns workspace on derive_more 2.1.0.

• Dependencies (broad updates):
  • Upgrade major stacks: aws-* SDKs, axum 0.7.9, hyper-util 0.1.19, reqwest 0.12.26, rustls 0.23.35 (+ rustls-pki-types/webpki), tower-http 0.6.8, yamux 0.13.8, quinn (with socket2 0.6.1), toml 0.9.10+spec-1.1.0, serde_with 3.16.1, schemars 1.1.0, ICU crates (icu_*), and many others.
  • Consolidate Windows crates to windows-sys 0.61.2 and windows-link references; bump libc, mio, hostname, console, etc.
• New crates added:
  • Apple/macOS: objc2 ecosystem (objc2-*, block2, dispatch2) and related integrations.
  • Tooling/runtime: ar_archive_writer, additional object 0.32.2, nix 0.30.1, redox_syscall 0.6.0.
• Removals/Cleanup:
  • Drop legacy build deps: bindgen, clang-sys, cexpr, plist; remove some pinned windows-link versions.
• Workspace alignment:
  • Update internal crates to use derive_more 2.1.0 (replacing 2.0.1).

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit af4a073. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[graphite-app]

Merge activity

• Dec 19, 4:15 PM UTC: This pull request can not be added to the Graphite merge queue. Please try rebasing and resubmitting to merge when ready.
• Dec 19, 4:15 PM UTC: Graphite disabled "merge when ready" on this PR due to: a merge conflict with the target branch; resolve the conflict and try again..

Your organization requires reapproval when changes are made, so Graphite has dismissed approvals. See the output of git range-diff at https://github.com/hashintel/hash/actions/runs/20376222194

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 222 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.588 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.819 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.976 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.269 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.047 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 127 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.464 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-36.300 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-82.172 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-49.126 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.643 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.867 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.314 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.228 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.591 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.384 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.102 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.554 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$40.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.463 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$75.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.819 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$44.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 209 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.230 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$46.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.220 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$55.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.040 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$41.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 220 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.852 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$418 \mathrm{ms} \pm 996 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.809 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$99.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 505 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.290 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$85.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 415 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.733 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$288 \mathrm{ms} \pm 792 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.799 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.990 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.338 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.560 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$23.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 207 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$30.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 256 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 258 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.430 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.814 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 323 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$30.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$30.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 255 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.388 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.834 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$30.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.189 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$31.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 332 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.239 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$48.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$97.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 360 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.140 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$54.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 261 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 433 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$71.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 370 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$76.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.007 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$51.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.697 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$79.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 346 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$59.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.743 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.087 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$68.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 329 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.898 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$68.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.028 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$139 \mathrm{ms} \pm 393 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$138 \mathrm{ms} \pm 433 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$40.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-61.675 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$577 \mathrm{ms} \pm 806 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.371 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph