Update Rust crate derive_more to v2.1.1

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
derive_more	workspace.dependencies	patch	2.1.0 -> 2.1.1

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

JelteF/derive_more (derive_more)

v2.1.1

Compare Source

Fixed

• .as_dyn_error() method hygiene inside Error derive expansion.
  (#​527)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[cursor]

PR Summary

Dependency-only changes.

• Bumps derive_more from 2.1.0 to 2.1.1 across multiple workspace crates (and derive_more-impl accordingly)
• Refreshes Cargo.lock checksums and versions; data-encoding-macro-internal now depends on syn 1.0.109 (was 2.0.111)
• No source files modified

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit be5b09d. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 58.89%. Comparing base (06cc531) to head (be5b09d).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8220      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   58.90%   58.89%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1193     1193              
  Lines      112723   112723              
  Branches     5013     5013              
==========================================
- Hits        66394    66393       -1     
- Misses      45571    45572       +1     
  Partials      758      758              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.14% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	46.65% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	88.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Lockfile-only dependency refresh to pick up derive_more v2.1.1.

• Bumps derive_more / derive_more-impl from 2.1.0 � 2.1.1 (includes the .as_dyn_error() hygiene fix in the Error derive expansion).
• Updates Cargo.lock entries for all workspace crates that resolve derive_more.
• As part of dependency re-resolution, data-encoding-macro-internal now resolves against syn 1.0.109 (was 2.0.111).

Impact: No repository source code changes; this should only affect the build-time dependency graph.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$25.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 208 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-43.250 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.946 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$11.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.161 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$41.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 248 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.153 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.784 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$22.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 133 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.240 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$25.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-47.228 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-83.216 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-66.237 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.029 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.035 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.244 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.465 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.540 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.898 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.338 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.872 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.75 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.79 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.02 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.80 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$38.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 142 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.876 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$74.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.350 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$42.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$53.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$39.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 129 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.825 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$410 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.19 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.629 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$93.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 390 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$83.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 391 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.444 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$277 \mathrm{ms} \pm 659 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.344 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$17.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.942 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.710 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.171 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.695 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$21.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.653 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 396 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.064 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 256 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$28.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 222 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.909 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.043 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.924 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$29.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$28.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 282 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.824 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$28.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.862 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$28.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 282 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.861 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$7.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.123 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$45.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.192 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$92.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 364 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.450 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$50.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 327 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.898 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$58.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 335 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.639 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.376 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$72.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.979 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$48.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.998 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$74.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.558 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$55.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.131 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.118 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.424 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 369 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.713 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$143 \mathrm{ms} \pm 466 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.123 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$137 \mathrm{ms} \pm 469 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.618 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$38.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-62.697 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$602 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.28 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.531 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph