Update Rust crate proc-macro2 to v1.0.104

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
proc-macro2	workspace.dependencies	patch	1.0.103 -> 1.0.104

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

dtolnay/proc-macro2 (proc-macro2)

v1.0.104

Compare Source

• Add Rust 1.92.0's TokenStream Extend impls (#​527, rust-lang/rust#145722)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[cursor]

PR Summary

Minimal dependency update.

• Bumps proc-macro2 in Cargo.lock from 1.0.103 to 1.0.104 (checksum updated); no source code changes

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit fe1c3e0. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Rust dependency lockfile entry for proc-macro2 to the latest patch release.

Changes: Bumps proc-macro2 from 1.0.103 to 1.0.104 in Cargo.lock (checksum updated accordingly).

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.02%. Comparing base (f12be3c) to head (fe1c3e0).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8224   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.02%   59.02%           
=======================================
  Files        1187     1187           
  Lines      112486   112486           
  Branches     4939     4939           
=======================================
+ Hits        66393    66396    +3     
+ Misses      45335    45332    -3     
  Partials      758      758           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.19% <ø> (+0.04%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	46.65% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	88.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.125 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 94.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$41.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.748 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.743 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$22.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 142 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.991 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$33.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-20.718 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$5.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-73.523 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$18.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-32.751 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.330 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.160 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.310 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.044 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.097 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.474 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.777 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.851 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.68 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$38.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.829 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$75.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 400 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.994 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$41.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.418 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.295 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$52.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 301 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.899 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$40.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.646 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$414 \mathrm{ms} \pm 805 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.939 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$96.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 358 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$83.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 246 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.213 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$308 \mathrm{ms} \pm 871 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.860 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.985 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.048 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.028 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.336 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 122 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.832 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$28.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 238 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.644 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$28.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 310 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.518 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 237 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$28.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 248 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.403 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.924 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 237 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.410 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 257 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.733 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.437 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$44.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 222 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.007 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$93.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 357 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.516 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$49.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.062 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$58.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.123 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$67.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 348 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.666 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$73.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 395 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.655 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$48.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.448 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$77.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 424 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$55.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 355 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.125 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$63.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 359 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.111 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 415 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.851 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$65.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 343 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.715 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$141 \mathrm{ms} \pm 460 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$139 \mathrm{ms} \pm 478 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$39.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 229 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-59.168 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$581 \mathrm{ms} \pm 998 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.726 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph