Update Rust crate reqwest to v0.12.28

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
reqwest	workspace.dependencies	patch	0.12.26 -> 0.12.28

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

seanmonstar/reqwest (reqwest)

v0.12.28

Compare Source

• Fix compiling on Windows if TLS and SOCKS features are not enabled.

v0.12.27

Compare Source

• Add ClientBuilder::windows_named_pipe(name) option that will force all requests over that Windows Named Piper.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[cursor]

PR Summary

Updates dependency versions only; no source changes.

• Bump reqwest from 0.12.26 to 0.12.28 in Cargo.lock
• Align transitive windows-sys from 0.52.0 to 0.59.0 across errno, quinn-udp, rustix, and tempfile

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit e8d0251. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Refreshes Rust dependencies to bump reqwest from 0.12.26 to 0.12.28.


Changes: Updates Cargo.lock accordingly, including pulling in windows-sys 0.59.0 via transitive dependencies (and the Windows compilation fix from the reqwest patch release).

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.02%. Comparing base (f12be3c) to head (e8d0251).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8225   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.02%   59.02%           
=======================================
  Files        1187     1187           
  Lines      112486   112486           
  Branches     4939     4939           
=======================================
+ Hits        66393    66394    +1     
+ Misses      45335    45334    -1     
  Partials      758      758           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.16% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	46.65% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	88.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 231 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.879 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.139 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 337 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 94.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 138 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.430 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$26.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-40.900 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-82.423 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-52.598 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.516 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.448 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.331 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.044 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.703 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.406 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.376 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.30 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.33 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$39.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 142 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$76.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 379 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$43.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.254 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$53.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$40.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$415 \mathrm{ms} \pm 892 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.041 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$95.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 390 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.654 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$84.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 362 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.933 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$282 \mathrm{ms} \pm 650 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.479 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 138 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$31.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 248 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.120 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 268 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.196 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.495 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 310 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.910 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.203 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.655 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 268 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$30.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 273 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.701 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.665 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$47.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 188 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$95.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 349 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.773 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$53.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$61.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$70.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 328 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.935 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$75.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 324 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.407 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$50.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.022 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$78.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 461 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$57.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 355 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.810 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$67.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 376 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.812 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$67.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 434 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.958 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 492 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.546 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 372 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.916 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$39.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 180 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-61.895 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$596 \mathrm{ms} \pm 893 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph