Update Rust crate serde_json to v1.0.148

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
serde_json	workspace.dependencies	patch	1.0.145 -> 1.0.148

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

serde-rs/json (serde_json)

v1.0.148

Compare Source

• Update zmij dependency to 1.0

v1.0.147

Compare Source

• Switch float-to-string algorithm from Ryū to Żmij for better f32 and f64 serialization performance (#​1304)

v1.0.146

Compare Source

• Set fast_arithmetic=64 for riscv64 (#​1305, thanks @​Xeonacid)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[cursor]

PR Summary

Dependency update

• Bumps serde_json from 1.0.145 to 1.0.148 in Cargo.lock
• Adds new zmij 1.0.0 package and serde_json dependency; removes ryu from serde_json deps
• Adjusts data-encoding-macro-internal to use syn 1.0.109 (from 2.0.111) in the lockfile

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 694e30e. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Bumps serde_json in Cargo.lock from 1.0.145 to 1.0.148, switching float serialization from ryu to zmij.
Note: The lockfile also re-resolves data-encoding-macro-internal to use syn 1.0.109 instead of 2.0.111.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. 1 suggestions posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[augmentcode]

This lockfile change also switches data-encoding-macro-internal from syn 2.0.111 to syn 1.0.109. If the intent is a tightly-scoped serde_json bump, it may be worth confirming this extra dependency re-resolution is expected.

_{🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.02%. Comparing base (aee5b54) to head (694e30e).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8226   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.02%   59.02%           
=======================================
  Files        1187     1187           
  Lines      112486   112486           
  Branches     4939     4939           
=======================================
+ Hits        66393    66394    +1     
+ Misses      45335    45334    -1     
  Partials      758      758           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.16% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	46.65% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	88.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.435 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$45.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 360 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.7 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$25.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 147 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 168 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-36.781 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-81.357 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-46.634 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.499 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}14.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}15.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.32 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}13.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$40.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$77.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 398 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$45.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$47.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 246 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$56.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 380 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$41.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$415 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.18 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.066 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$97.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 403 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$86.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 467 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$290 \mathrm{ms} \pm 663 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.986 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$23.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 156 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$31.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$31.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 338 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$30.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 320 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 276 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$31.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$30.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$31.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 261 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$30.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$30.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$50.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 256 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 411 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$55.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$65.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 349 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$75.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 505 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$80.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 409 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$54.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$81.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 364 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$62.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}13.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$68.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 363 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$71.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 363 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$70.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 339 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$132 \mathrm{ms} \pm 564 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.790 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 566 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.893 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$39.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 191 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-62.286 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$565 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.07 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.966 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph