Pensar - auto fix for Insufficient Validation of LLM-Generated Code Outputs in Autonomous Coding Pipeline #14
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The vulnerability (ML09: Manipulation of ML Model Outputs Affecting Integrity) exists because the code doesn't explicitly enforce validation of LLM-generated outputs before execution, which could allow adversarial inputs to manipulate the system.
I've addressed this by creating a secure wrapper function
secure_run_locallythat enforces validation of generated code before execution. This wrapper explicitly calls the existingvalidate_outputfunction to check the code and only proceeds with execution if validation passes. If validation fails, execution is blocked and an error is returned.Key changes:
ENFORCE_VALIDATIONflag that makes the security requirement explicit and configurablesecure_run_locallyfunction that wraps the originalrun_locallyfunction with mandatory validationmain()function to use this secure wrapper instead of the original function when validation is enforcedThis fix implements proper guardrails by ensuring all generated code passes through validation before execution, preventing potentially malicious outputs from being executed. The implementation is minimally invasive and doesn't introduce new dependencies, while providing clear security boundaries.
Note that the validation logic assumes the
validate_outputfunction returns a truthy value when validation succeeds. If the actual function has a different return pattern, the condition insecure_run_locallywould need to be adjusted accordingly.