Skip to content

Conversation

@JaimeRZP
Copy link
Contributor

@JaimeRZP JaimeRZP commented Nov 28, 2025

fixes: #346

@JaimeRZP JaimeRZP changed the title Unmixing refactor gh-346 Unmixing refactor Nov 28, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 28, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 77.47748% with 25 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
heracles/unmixing.py 38.46% 16 Missing ⚠️
heracles/transforms.py 89.47% 8 Missing ⚠️
heracles/twopoint.py 66.66% 1 Missing ⚠️
Flag Coverage Δ
py3.10 82.58% <77.47%> (-0.22%) ⬇️
py3.11 82.58% <77.47%> (-0.22%) ⬇️
py3.12 82.55% <77.47%> (-0.22%) ⬇️
py3.13 82.11% <75.67%> (-0.29%) ⬇️
py3.9 82.61% <77.47%> (-0.22%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
heracles/dices/jackknife.py 97.34% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
heracles/utils.py 95.83% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️
heracles/twopoint.py 95.04% <66.66%> (-0.39%) ⬇️
heracles/transforms.py 84.39% <89.47%> (+3.98%) ⬆️
heracles/unmixing.py 60.00% <38.46%> (-25.94%) ⬇️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

We should allow different scale cuts when unmixing different fields

2 participants