Skip to content

feat(1286): Custom fees for fungible tokens#1287

Open
matevszm wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
feat-1286/custom-fees-ft
Open

feat(1286): Custom fees for fungible tokens#1287
matevszm wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
feat-1286/custom-fees-ft

Conversation

@matevszm
Copy link
Contributor

@matevszm matevszm requested a review from a team as a code owner January 30, 2026 11:11
@matevszm matevszm force-pushed the feat-1286/custom-fees-ft branch from a1f6cbb to 9ee625d Compare January 30, 2026 11:12
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Unit Test Results

771 tests  +11   771 ✅ +11   47s ⏱️ +3s
 79 suites ± 0     0 💤 ± 0 
  1 files   ± 0     0 ❌ ± 0 

Results for commit aab4b2a. ± Comparison against base commit acd71a4.

This pull request removes 4 and adds 15 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
Token Schema Validation CustomFeeSchema should accept any collector ID format (no validation) ‑ Token Schema Validation CustomFeeSchema should accept any collector ID format (no validation)
Token Schema Validation CustomFeeSchema should accept any fee type (no validation) ‑ Token Schema Validation CustomFeeSchema should accept any fee type (no validation)
Token Schema Validation CustomFeeSchema should accept negative amount (no validation) ‑ Token Schema Validation CustomFeeSchema should accept negative amount (no validation)
Token Schema Validation CustomFeeSchema should validate valid custom fee ‑ Token Schema Validation CustomFeeSchema should validate valid custom fee
Token Schema Validation FungibleTokenFileSchema customFees max limit should accept up to 10 custom fees ‑ Token Schema Validation FungibleTokenFileSchema customFees max limit should accept up to 10 custom fees
Token Schema Validation FungibleTokenFileSchema customFees max limit should reject more than 10 custom fees ‑ Token Schema Validation FungibleTokenFileSchema customFees max limit should reject more than 10 custom fees
Token Schema Validation TokenFileCustomFeeSchema should reject fractional fee when min > max ‑ Token Schema Validation TokenFileCustomFeeSchema should reject fractional fee when min > max
Token Schema Validation TokenFileCustomFeeSchema should reject fractional fee when numerator > denominator ‑ Token Schema Validation TokenFileCustomFeeSchema should reject fractional fee when numerator > denominator
Token Schema Validation TokenFileCustomFeeSchema should reject invalid collectorId format ‑ Token Schema Validation TokenFileCustomFeeSchema should reject invalid collectorId format
Token Schema Validation TokenFileCustomFeeSchema should reject invalid fee type ‑ Token Schema Validation TokenFileCustomFeeSchema should reject invalid fee type
Token Schema Validation TokenFileCustomFeeSchema should reject negative amount for fixed fee ‑ Token Schema Validation TokenFileCustomFeeSchema should reject negative amount for fixed fee
Token Schema Validation TokenFileCustomFeeSchema should validate fractional fee with min and max ‑ Token Schema Validation TokenFileCustomFeeSchema should validate fractional fee with min and max
Token Schema Validation TokenFileCustomFeeSchema should validate valid fixed HBAR fee ‑ Token Schema Validation TokenFileCustomFeeSchema should validate valid fixed HBAR fee
Token Schema Validation TokenFileCustomFeeSchema should validate valid fixed TOKEN fee ‑ Token Schema Validation TokenFileCustomFeeSchema should validate valid fixed TOKEN fee
…

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Integration Test Results

26 tests  +3   26 ✅ +3   5m 12s ⏱️ +34s
18 suites +1    0 💤 ±0 
 1 files   ±0    0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit aab4b2a. ± Comparison against base commit acd71a4.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Signed-off-by: matevszm <mateusz.marcinkowski@blockydevs.com>
Signed-off-by: matevszm <mateusz.marcinkowski@blockydevs.com>
@matevszm matevszm force-pushed the feat-1286/custom-fees-ft branch from 9ee625d to aab4b2a Compare February 5, 2026 15:02
@matevszm matevszm requested a review from a team as a code owner February 5, 2026 15:02
@matevszm matevszm requested a review from leninmehedy February 5, 2026 15:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant