docs: add method chaining examples

[suyash1567]

Description: Added method chaining example at the end of Section 3 in docs/sdk_developers/training/coding_token_transactions.md

Related issue(s):

Fixes #1194

Notes for reviewer:

Checklist

• Documented (Code comments, README, etc.)
• Tested (unit, integration, etc.)

[github-actions]

[commit-verification-bot]
Hi, this is VerificationBot.
Your pull request cannot be merged as it has unverified commits.
View your commit verification status: Commits Tab.

To achieve verified status, please read:

• Signing guide
• README
• Discord

Remember, you require a GPG key and each commit must be signed with:
git commit -S -s -m "Your message here"

Thank you for contributing!

From the Hiero Python SDK Team

[exploreriii]

Hi this is looking good please, is it ready to review?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1200   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.28%   91.28%           
=======================================
  Files         139      139           
  Lines        8447     8447           
=======================================
  Hits         7711     7711           
  Misses        736      736           

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[suyash1567]

@exploreriii Yes please go ahead and review

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds documentation demonstrating method chaining for TokenAssociateTransaction in the developer training guide and inserts a corresponding changelog entry; includes comparative code examples (standard vs. chained usage).

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Updates CHANGELOG.md, docs/sdk_developers/training/coding_token_transactions.md	Added a changelog entry and a new subsection (Setters and Method Chaining) showing method chaining for TokenAssociateTransaction, with example code comparing line-by-line setters vs. chained calls.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'docs: add method chaining examples' clearly and concisely summarizes the primary change: adding documentation examples for method chaining.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description is related to the changeset, mentioning the addition of method chaining examples to the coding_token_transactions.md file and referencing issue #1194.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The PR successfully implements the requirements from issue #1194: adds method chaining code examples to Section 3 of coding_token_transactions.md, updates CHANGELOG.md per guidelines, and uses proper commit messaging.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	All changes are directly aligned with issue #1194 objectives: only documentation updates and changelog entries were added with no unrelated modifications.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ea91f78 and a42c2b1.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• CHANGELOG.md
• docs/sdk_developers/training/coding_token_transactions.md

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

docs/sdk_developers/training/coding_token_transactions.md

72-72: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)

---

80-80: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)

• GitHub Check: build-and-test (3.12)
• GitHub Check: build-and-test (3.10)
• GitHub Check: build-and-test (3.13)
• GitHub Check: build-and-test (3.11)
• GitHub Check: run-examples
• GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis

🔇 Additional comments (2)

CHANGELOG.md (1)

12-12: Verify issue reference in changelog entry.

The changelog entry references issue #1194, but this PR is #1200. Confirm whether #1194 is the related issue this documentation change addresses, or if the reference should be updated to #1200.

docs/sdk_developers/training/coding_token_transactions.md (1)

50-81: Documentation content is clear and well-structured.

The method chaining explanation at line 68 with concrete examples effectively demonstrates the benefit of the setter pattern. The side-by-side comparison clearly shows both the standard and chained approaches, which will help developers understand the flexibility of the API design.

[Adityarya11]

@exploreriii Yes please go ahead and review

@suyash1567 first of all in the PR you should write the stuff the description
At least mention the issue no. In the Fixes...

[Adityarya11]

Please use the correct formatting for the markdown @suyash1567 and you are good to go👍

[suyash1567]

Hi, @exploreriii you can review the code now

[exploreriii]

Super!
Thanks for taking the time to get this just right

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a42c2b1 and 7ae7f9c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/sdk_developers/training/coding_token_transactions.md

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

docs/sdk_developers/training/coding_token_transactions.md

79-79: Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD031, blanks-around-fences)

---

81-81: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)

---

81-81: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)

---

82-82: Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD031, blanks-around-fences)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)

• GitHub Check: run-examples
• GitHub Check: build-and-test (3.11)
• GitHub Check: build-and-test (3.10)
• GitHub Check: build-and-test (3.12)
• GitHub Check: build-and-test (3.13)
• GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis

[exploreriii]

Great work @suyash1567 thank you very much