Skip to content

Conversation

@emiliyank
Copy link
Contributor

Description:
Add instructions to CodeRabbit for limiting reviews to issue scope.

Fixes #1373

Checklist

  • Documented (Code comments, README, etc.)

@emiliyank emiliyank requested a review from exploreriii January 6, 2026 21:07
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 6, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A global review instruction block was added to the CodeRabbit configuration file to scope review feedback to the issue/PR requirements and prevent out-of-scope suggestions. A corresponding changelog entry documents this change.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CodeRabbit Configuration
\.coderabbit.yaml``
Introduced global instructions section with ABSOLUTE RULES constraining review feedback to issue/PR scope and SCOPE CONTROL directing out-of-scope findings to follow-up issues instead of blocking changes
Changelog
\CHANGELOG.md``
Added entry in Unreleased section documenting the addition of global review instructions to limit CodeRabbit reviews to stated issue/PR scope

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the main change: adding instructions to CodeRabbit to provide issue-specific review feedback.
Description check ✅ Passed The description directly addresses the changeset, stating the goal to add CodeRabbit instructions limiting reviews to issue scope and referencing the related issue.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed The PR fully implements the requirements from issue #1373 by adding global review instructions to .coderabbit.yaml that enforce scope control and ABSOLUTE RULES as specified.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed All changes are directly in scope: modifications to .coderabbit.yaml and CHANGELOG.md align with issue #1373 requirements without unrelated additions.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b674839 and 09362b1.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .coderabbit.yaml
  • CHANGELOG.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: run-examples
  • GitHub Check: build-and-test (3.10)
  • GitHub Check: build-and-test (3.13)
  • GitHub Check: build-and-test (3.12)
  • GitHub Check: build-and-test (3.11)
  • GitHub Check: StepSecurity Harden-Runner
🔇 Additional comments (2)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

92-92: LGTM!

The changelog entry accurately documents the addition of global review instructions and properly references issue #1373. The placement in the "Changed" section is appropriate since this modifies an existing configuration file.

.coderabbit.yaml (1)

22-35: Consider potential conflict with the assertive profile.

The new global instructions correctly implement the requirements from issue #1373 by limiting review scope to the PR/issue description. However, there may be a tension between these scope-limiting instructions and the existing profile: "assertive" setting (line 9), which is configured to yield "more feedback, that may be considered nitpicky."

The ABSOLUTE RULES state "Do NOT propose improvements, refactors, or enhancements to the developer beyond what the PR explicitly claims to address," which could conflict with the assertive profile's nature.

Please verify that CodeRabbit properly prioritizes these explicit global instructions over the assertive profile's default behavior. You may want to monitor the first few PRs after this change to ensure the scope-limiting instructions are being respected.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 6, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1378   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.44%   92.44%           
=======================================
  Files         139      139           
  Lines        8528     8528           
=======================================
  Hits         7884     7884           
  Misses        644      644           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@exploreriii exploreriii merged commit cdeb749 into hiero-ledger:main Jan 6, 2026
20 checks passed
@exploreriii
Copy link
Contributor

Brilliant - thank you so much for this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Beginner]: Prompt Coderabbit to have ISSUE REQUIREMENT CONTEXT

2 participants