Skip to content

Conversation

@mpotthoff
Copy link

Proposed change

This PR adds a new type option called first to the sensor group in the group component.

A sensor group with type: first will always resolve to the first available sensor in that group.
By itself, that might not sound particularly useful, but when combined with the ignore_non_numeric configuration option, it becomes quite powerful - the combination will resolve to the first numeric (and thus available) sensor in the group.

My use case:

I control my heating using a temperature sensor in each room. Unfortunately, these sensors are battery-powered, so occasionally a battery runs out and the sensor becomes unavailable — usually when I’m away from home or on vacation. When that happens, my heating automations break because the room temperature is no longer available.

However, each room also has other sensors that additionally report the room temperature, just with lower accuracy.
This new feature allows me to combine all of those sensors into a single sensor group per room, ordered by precision. If the most accurate sensor becomes unavailable, the group automatically falls back to the next one. This way, my heating continues to function normally (just with less precision), and once I replace the battery, the group automatically switches back to using the first (most accurate) sensor.

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:
  • Link to developer documentation pull request:
  • Link to frontend pull request:

Checklist

  • I understand the code I am submitting and can explain how it works.
  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.
  • Any generated code has been carefully reviewed for correctness and compliance with project standards.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

@mpotthoff mpotthoff requested a review from a team as a code owner October 30, 2025 20:12
Copy link

@home-assistant home-assistant bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @mpotthoff

It seems you haven't yet signed a CLA. Please do so here.

Once you do that we will be able to review and accept this pull request.

Thanks!

@home-assistant
Copy link

Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍

Learn more about our pull request process.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot marked this pull request as draft October 30, 2025 20:12
@home-assistant
Copy link

Hey there @home-assistant/core, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (group) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!

Code owner commands

Code owners of group can trigger bot actions by commenting:

  • @home-assistant close Closes the pull request.
  • @home-assistant rename Awesome new title Renames the pull request.
  • @home-assistant reopen Reopen the pull request.
  • @home-assistant unassign group Removes the current integration label and assignees on the pull request, add the integration domain after the command.
  • @home-assistant add-label needs-more-information Add a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) to the pull request.
  • @home-assistant remove-label needs-more-information Remove a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) on the pull request.

@mpotthoff mpotthoff marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2025 20:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant