Skip to content

Conversation

@hooyuser
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @hooyuser, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request updates the generate_release_pdf.yml file. Based on the filename, it seems to be related to the generation of release PDFs, likely within a CI/CD pipeline. Without more context or the diff content, I can only assume the changes involve updating configurations, dependencies, or scripts used in the PDF generation process.

Highlights

  • Workflow Update: The pull request modifies the generate_release_pdf.yml workflow file, potentially altering the process of generating release PDFs.

Changelog

  • generate_release_pdf.yml
    • Modifications to the YAML configuration file for generating release PDFs.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


A YAML file,
Guides the PDF's creation,
Release notes appear.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request updates the generate_release_pdf.yml file. Since no style guide was provided, I will be reviewing the code based on general best practices and common sense.

Merge Readiness

The pull request modifies a configuration file. Without knowing the specifics of the system, it's difficult to assess the impact of these changes. I am unable to approve the pull request in any circumstance, and that users should have others review and approve this code before merging. I recommend having someone familiar with the system review these changes.

@hooyuser hooyuser merged commit 2c0004d into master Apr 12, 2025
1 check passed
@hooyuser hooyuser deleted the hooyuser-patch-2 branch April 12, 2025 00:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants