-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 374
[Inference Providers] Document automatic validation cron job #1822
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The validation part looks good! thanks for adding it! 🤗
|
care pushing just the part that changed? (sorry) |
|
git add > partial commit |
| For large language models (LLMs), additional behavioral tests are conducted: | ||
|
|
||
| - Tool calling support. | ||
| - Structured output support. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
does this mark the model as in error as well? or it's a ≠ UI? (seems a bit heavy to mark it as Failing validation for this)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It does not - for now it just feeds a map of booleans flagging wether or not the provider-llm pair supports the feature
The tests are only carried out if the initial test succeeds (first token received in < 5s)
It's not displayed nor used anywhere yet
8225a6e to
91dcdf7
Compare
Document how we validate inference provider mappings
Sorry for all the whitespace changes 😬 My linter