⚗️ Use tshy instead of tsup for releasing tasks

[coyotte508]

Follow up to #1026

Benefit is that exports are better defined, and source-mapping works.

Also, move the generation scripts from @huggingace/tasks to @huggingface/tasks-gen cc @Wauplin @SBrandeis

So that the dev dependencies are not tacked on @huggingface/tasks. Some package managers, cough yarn cough like to download them when importing a package, even if they're irrelevant.

[coyotte508]

cc @krampstudio , hopefully it still works

[coyotte508]

We could just do const rootDir = "../tasks" since the script is always executed in the /packages/tasks-gen context

[Pierrci]

didn't try it (obviously), but lgtm 😄

[Pierrci]

interesting CI errors haha ^^'

[coyotte508]

interesting CI errors haha ^^'

well yea, going bakc to adding main/module/types fields

[Pierrci]

Warning: relying on top-level main/types will likely cause incorrect types to be loaded in some scenarios.

Use with extreme caution. It's almost always better to not define top-level main and types fields if you are shipping a hybrid module. Users will need to update their module and moduleResolution tsconfigs appropriately. That is a good thing, and will save them future headaches.

but yeah for now probably simpler :)

[coyotte508]

Warning: relying on top-level main/types will likely cause incorrect types to be loaded in some scenarios.
Use with extreme caution. It's almost always better to not define top-level main and types fields if you are shipping a hybrid module. Users will need to update their module and moduleResolution tsconfigs appropriately. That is a good thing, and will save them future headaches.

but yeah for now probably simpler :)

I could remove the fields, but then we have to update the moon codebase ASAP :)