Prefer raising TypeError exception for invalid type

[Sai-Suraj-27]

What does this PR do?

Fixes raising of TypeError exception instead of ValueError for invalid type

Before submitting

• This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if that's the case).
• Did you read the contributor guideline,
  Pull Request section?
• Was this discussed/approved via a Github issue or the forum? Please add a link
  to it if that's the case.
• Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? Here are the
  documentation guidelines, and
  here are tips on formatting docstrings.
• Did you write any new necessary tests?

Who can review?

@Rocketknight1 @ArthurZucker

[Rocketknight1]

This seems okay, but please check the failing tests in the CI. It's likely that some tests are set up to catch certain errors, and the changed error has broken them!

[github-actions]

[For maintainers] Suggested jobs to run (before merge)

run-slow: evolla, gemma3n, lfm2_vl, ovis2, perception_lm, sam, sam2, sam2_video

[Sai-Suraj-27]

@Rocketknight1 Yes, Updated the PR. Failing test seems un-related to the changes.