Markdown recursive parser #172
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
Done. I understand from the doc and discussions I could read that Vite only supports one build config, and that if you want two, you have to create two config files and call them explicitly. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Upgrades the Markdown component from using regexes that were never going to work, to a recursive token parser that does better.
Lots more markdown tests added.
@severo I moved
vite.app.config.jstovite.config.ts. This makes it so thatnpx vitestworks without specifying the config file. Also switched to typescript for better typechecking of the config file (maybe should do same for vite.lib.config.js? can we combine those?).