feat: remove dataProtectorSharing from the doc#79
Merged
Le-Caignec merged 10 commits intomainfrom Oct 13, 2025
Merged
Conversation
- Implement `processProtectedData` method for secure processing of encrypted datasets. - Introduce `protectData` method for client-side encryption of user data. - Add `revokeAllAccess` method to manage access permissions for protected data. - Create `revokeOneAccess` method for targeted revocation of access permissions. - Implement `transferOwnership` method to transfer ownership of protected data securely.
- Removed references to the DataProtector Sharing module and related examples from quick-start and use-cases documentation. - Updated links in various methods to point to the correct paths for access management functions. - Streamlined content in the DataProtector overview and getting-started sections for clarity. - Enhanced descriptions for project cards in tooling and explorers section to provide better context.
- Changed sidebar text from 'DataProtector Core' to 'Methods' for clarity. - Revised introduction of the monetization guide to emphasize transforming encrypted data into a revenue stream. - Streamlined content by removing outdated sections on time-based access and focusing on signed orders for monetization.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Le-Caignec
changed the title
Le-Caignec
changed the title
ErwanDecoster
requested changes
Oct 10, 2025
Member
ErwanDecoster
left a comment
ErwanDecoster
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I still found a mention of IExecDataProtectorSharing in src/references/dataProtector/getting-started.md.
64ix
reviewed
Oct 13, 2025
64ix
reviewed
Oct 13, 2025
64ix
reviewed
Oct 13, 2025
64ix
requested changes
Oct 13, 2025
…ithub.com/iExecBlockchainComputing/documentation into feat/remove-dataProtectorsharing-from-doc
Collaborator
Author
|
@64ix We only removed addOnlyAppWhitelist. That whitelist is useful for dataProtectorSharing. |
ErwanDecoster
approved these changes
Oct 13, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.