Skip to content

Conversation

@gfournierPro
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@gfournierPro gfournierPro self-assigned this Aug 12, 2025
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 12, 2025 14:06
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

Implements pause functionality for bridge operations with two-level pause system. Adds emergency pause scripts to halt bridge operations for security incidents, with Level 1 (complete pause) blocking all operations and Level 2 (outbound-only pause) allowing receives while blocking sends.

  • Adds Makefile targets for pause/unpause operations on single chains
  • Creates Solidity scripts for bridge pause management with validation
  • Implements comprehensive test coverage for all pause scenarios and access controls

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 5 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
tools/pauser.mk Defines Makefile targets for pause operations with CI/local environment handling
script/PauseBridge.s.sol Core pause scripts implementing two-level pause system with validation
test/units/PauseBridgeScript.t.sol Complete test suite covering pause operations, authorization, and edge cases
Makefile Includes the new pauser.mk file
.github/workflows/bridge-pause-operations.yml GitHub Actions workflow for automated pause operations

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 12, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (main@6c1d7c9). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #93   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   83.78%           
=======================================
  Files           ?        4           
  Lines           ?      111           
  Branches        ?        7           
=======================================
  Hits            ?       93           
  Misses          ?       17           
  Partials        ?        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@Le-Caignec Le-Caignec left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It could be nice to add a step in the default CI to check that these scripts always work, so we don’t break anything while developing new feature

vm.stopPrank();
}

// ====== Role and Authorization Tests ======
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the role and authorization tests here are unnecessary. The goal of this file is to ensure that the deployment script works properly, not to verify that the pause functionality has been implemented correctly. Moreover, this is already covered in another unit test file. What do you think?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

*execution script, not the deployment script
but yes will remove this part

@gfournierPro
Copy link
Contributor Author

gfournierPro commented Sep 12, 2025

It could be nice to add a step in the default CI to check that these scripts always work, so we don’t break anything while developing new feature

it's tested in

  • name: Run Foundry coverage step
image

@gfournierPro gfournierPro merged commit 727dd92 into main Sep 12, 2025
4 checks passed
@gfournierPro gfournierPro deleted the feature/pause-scripts branch September 12, 2025 13:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants