Skip to content

Conversation

@hugary1995
Copy link
Contributor

ref #32211

Copy link
Member

@cticenhour cticenhour left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for adding all this! I had a few suggestions I wanted to note.

@cticenhour cticenhour self-assigned this Jan 28, 2026
@moosebuild
Copy link
Contributor

Job Documentation, step Docs: sync website on 495f7cb wanted to post the following:

View the site here

This comment will be updated on new commits.

When developing your own application, it is generally advised to start from the `devel` build, as it
offers a reasonable balance between speed and debugging checks. When an error cannot be easily addressed
with the information provided by the `devel` build, a `dbg` executable can be built for use in debuggers.
See [this page](application_development/debugging.md) for instructions on running the `dbg` executable
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Without looking at the CI too closely, I imagine the failing apps do not have this markdown file (or the other one you link on line 72) available in their MooseDocs content. If you wanted to avoid a bunch of little patches....you could apply optional=True to stop this from being rendered when the file doesn't exist (might be wonky for those who get here in their application websites), or send them to the direct URL on the MOOSE website (which could be subject to change, but at least it is clickable on these broken apps!).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants