Skip to content

Conversation

@igorcampos-dev
Copy link
Owner

@igorcampos-dev igorcampos-dev commented Jul 24, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated workflow to run only on pull requests to the master branch affecting the spring-kafka-example directory.
    • Renamed the build job to integration-tests.
    • Added a health check job to verify that required Docker containers are running during workflow execution.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 24, 2025

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions workflow for the spring-kafka-example was updated to trigger only on pull requests to the master branch affecting files under spring-kafka-example/**. The build job was renamed to integration-tests, and a new health-check job was added to verify the running state of Docker containers for the application and Kafka services.

Changes

Files/Paths Change Summary
.github/workflows/spring-kafka-example.yml Modified workflow triggers, renamed build job to integration-tests, and added a new health-check job for Docker container validation.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Suggested labels

component : spring-kafka-example

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation - Beta

CodeRabbit's unit test generation is now available in Beta! Automatically generate comprehensive unit tests for your code changes, ensuring better test coverage and catching edge cases you might miss. Our AI analyzes your code structure and creates tests that follow best practices and your project's testing patterns. Learn more here, or just try it under ✨ Finishing Touches.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch patch/worfklow-spring-kafka-example

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9956e42 and 4440314.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/spring-kafka-example.yml (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: igorcampos-dev
PR: igorcampos-dev/spring-integrations-examples#21
File: spring-kafka-example/compose.yaml:30-32
Timestamp: 2025-07-22T01:30:57.030Z
Learning: User igorcampos-dev prefers to maintain environment parity between local development and production, avoiding development-specific configurations like ALLOW_PLAINTEXT_LISTENER even when they might provide clearer intent or safety nets.
Learnt from: igorcampos-dev
PR: igorcampos-dev/spring-integrations-examples#26
File: spring-kafka-example/compose.yaml:3-4
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T01:40:49.299Z
Learning: User igorcampos-dev requires hard-coded container names in Docker Compose files (like `container_name: app`) for CI pipeline validation purposes, which is a valid operational requirement that overrides the general best practice of avoiding hard-coded container names.
Learnt from: igorcampos-dev
PR: igorcampos-dev/spring-integrations-examples#21
File: spring-kafka-example/README.md:12-17
Timestamp: 2025-07-22T01:35:41.364Z
Learning: User igorcampos-dev prefers minimal, high-level documentation in README files without detailed version specifications, choosing to keep tech stack information simple rather than adding precise version numbers.
🪛 actionlint (1.7.7)
.github/workflows/spring-kafka-example.yml

43-43: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

Comment on lines +39 to +41
health-check:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Run health-check only after tests finish

Unless there is a strong reason to run both jobs in parallel, chaining them makes the pipeline shorter (containers are started only if the Maven build succeeded) and surfaces failures earlier.

   health-check:
-    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    needs: integration-tests
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
health-check:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
health-check:
needs: integration-tests
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
# … existing steps …
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/workflows/spring-kafka-example.yml around lines 39 to 41, the
health-check job currently runs in parallel with other jobs. Modify the workflow
to make the health-check job depend on the successful completion of the test job
by adding a 'needs' attribute referencing the test job. This ensures the
health-check runs only after tests finish, optimizing pipeline execution and
failure visibility.

Comment on lines +42 to +45
- name: Checkout repository and submodules
uses: actions/checkout@v3
with:
submodules: true
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Bump actions/checkout to v4 to avoid deprecation/runtime errors

actionlint already warns that v3 runners are considered legacy and may eventually break.
You are already using v4 in the integration-tests job, so keeping versions consistent is a quick win.

-      - name: Checkout repository and submodules
-        uses: actions/checkout@v3
+      - name: Checkout repository and submodules
+        uses: actions/checkout@v4
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Checkout repository and submodules
uses: actions/checkout@v3
with:
submodules: true
- name: Checkout repository and submodules
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
submodules: true
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.7)

43-43: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/workflows/spring-kafka-example.yml at lines 42 to 45, the
actions/checkout version is set to v3, which is deprecated and may cause runtime
errors. Update the version from v3 to v4 in the uses field to align with the
integration-tests job and avoid potential issues.

@igorcampos-dev igorcampos-dev merged commit f971b9d into master Jul 24, 2025
3 checks passed
@igorcampos-dev igorcampos-dev deleted the patch/worfklow-spring-kafka-example branch July 24, 2025 23:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants