Skip to content

Conversation

saood06
Copy link
Collaborator

@saood06 saood06 commented Jul 8, 2025

I think this looks cleaner.

It does remove mentions to: IQ1_S_R4 PR 492, IQ1_M_R4 PR 494.

They didn't belong in that section, but now I don't know where it would go at all (Features?).

@ikawrakow
Copy link
Owner

They didn't belong in that section, but now I don't know where it would go at all (Features?).

They can go under "Quantization additions". IQ1_M_R4 and IQ1_S_R4 are distinct quantization types, not just repacked IQ1_M and IQ1_S.

Not sure if the tabular format for the new models works well. The table is quite squeezed already, and now Hunyuan has been added and dits.llm1 is pending. Do you know how you want to reformat/change to accommodate additional models?

@saood06
Copy link
Collaborator Author

saood06 commented Jul 9, 2025

They can go under "Quantization additions". IQ1_M_R4 and IQ1_S_R4 are distinct quantization types, not just repacked IQ1_M and IQ1_S.

Added them (by making a Misc) section.

Not sure if the tabular format for the new models works well. The table is quite squeezed already, and now Hunyuan has been added and dits.llm1 is pending. Do you know how you want to reformat/change to accommodate additional models?

I agree that it doesn't work well, but I wanted to try something to get rid of the block of text. I do think on top of just accommodating new models, this section might not belong in the "Latest News", since that makes it not mention all of the model supported inherited by mainline (and thus may confuse a user to thinking the listed models are the only models supported).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants