Skip to content

Conversation

@dimbleby
Copy link
Contributor

@dimbleby dimbleby commented Feb 22, 2025

Revisits #97, actually more or less reverses 84650b2

per that issue, it still is desirable that package metadata should be static. That is not currently the case: some wheels say that they want cffi >= 1.17, while others say that they want cffi >= 1.11.

Meanwhile "cffi is required on PyPy." seems to be the opposite of reality. As noted earlier in that file, PyPy vendors cffi - so it is the one python implementation where you definitely do not need a dependency on cffi.

Copy link
Owner

@indygreg indygreg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for fixing this.

I've cherry-picked this commit to my local branch and may tweak it slightly before pushing to address some bit rot.

@indygreg indygreg closed this in 58fca18 Aug 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants