-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
π Security Branch β Introduces vulnerable search endpoint #13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
π Infinitcode AI Code Review Report π
π Commit Quality Analysis β’ β‘ Performance Insights β’ π‘οΈ Security Audit
π― Executive Summary
This pull request introduces a new search feature for items, including a controller function, route, and service implementation. While the functionality adds value, multiple critical and major issues were identified, particularly concerning security vulnerabilities and error handling inefficiencies. The changes increase system complexity without sufficient safeguards.
Review Verdict: β Improvements Suggested
Critical security vulnerabilities and major risks identified, including command injection and information leakage.
π Files Changed
| File Path | Changes Detected |
|---|---|
src/controllers/itemController.js |
β’ Added a new async function searchItems to handle search requests.β’ The function calls itemService.searchItems and returns results or error details including stack trace. |
src/routes/itemRoutes.js |
β’ Added a new GET route for '/search' mapped to itemController.searchItems. |
src/services/itemService.js |
β’ Replaced the items array with database and restructured exported functions.β’ Added findItems function: parses search term via YAML, constructs regex, logs queries via shell command, and filters results. |
π¨ Code Quality Issues
π΄ Critical Severity
1. Command Injection Vulnerability
π File: src/services/itemService.js:~24
searchParams.term.
π§ Fix: Replace execSync with safe file-writing methods like fs.appendFileSync and sanitize inputs.
π Major Severity
1. Information Leakage via Error Stack
π File: src/controllers/itemController.js:25
π§ Fix: Replace error response with a generic message: res.status(500).json({ error: 'Internal server error' }).
- res.status(500).json({ error: err.message, stack: err.stack })
+ res.status(500).json({ error: 'Internal server error' })2. Regex-Based ReDoS Vulnerability
π File: src/services/itemService.js:~21
new RegExp(keyword) can trigger catastrophic backtracking, causing denial of service.
π§ Fix: Escape regex special characters in keyword or use safer string-matching methods like includes().
- const searchPattern = new RegExp(keyword)
+ const escapedKeyword = keyword.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\$&')
+ const searchPattern = new RegExp(escapedKeyword)π’ Minor Severity
1. Unnecessary YAML Parsing
π File: src/services/itemService.js:~16
π§ Fix: Directly use searchParams.term without YAML processing to simplify logic.
- let parsedYaml
- try {
- parsedYaml = yamlLib.load(`term: ${searchParams.term}`)
- } catch (parseErr) {
- throw parseErr
- }
- const keyword = parsedYaml.term
+ const keyword = searchParams.termπ Code Style & Consistency
π‘ Line 1:
Constant variable yamlLib should use SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE (e.g., YAML_LIB).
(Please follow project's naming conventions)
π‘ Line 2:
Constant variable execSync should use SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE (e.g., EXEC_SYNC).
(Please follow project's naming conventions)
π₯ Hot Take: Code Roast
π€ "This search feature is like using a flamethrower to light a candle: it wraps a simple string in YAML just to unwrap it, compiles a regex that could choke a supercomputer, and logs queries by asking the shell to scream them into a file. It's a Rube Goldberg machine of over-engineering, where every step invites chaos, and the error handling is so generous it practically hands attackers a map to your server's vulnerabilities."
π Review Metrics
β’ Files Analyzed: 3
β’ Issues Found: 4
β’ Casing Issues: 2
Automated review powered by Infinitcode AI π§ β‘
Report generated at 6/20/2025, 4:40:28 PM
|
@infinitcodeai what problem this PR solves, and do the changes actually address it? |
|
Based on the PR context and review analysis: π― Problem SolvedThis PR introduces a search endpoint (
|
| Issue | Severity | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Command Injection | Critical | Allows attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via searchParams.term |
| Error Stack Leakage | Major | Exposes server internals through error responses |
| ReDoS Vulnerability | Major | Enables denial-of-service attacks via malicious regex input |
| YAML Over-Engineering | Minor | Adds unnecessary complexity without benefit |
β¨ Improvement Recommendations
To properly address the search functionality:
- Eliminate command injection by replacing
execSyncwith safe file operations - Sanitize regex inputs by escaping special characters
- Remove YAML parsing since it provides no value
- Implement generic error responses to avoid information leakage
The current implementation creates more risks than it solves. Security fixes must be implemented before considering merge.
π¦ Context details
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| Repository | infinitcodecom/infinitcode-ai-demo |
| PR Number | #13 |
| PR State | open |
| Total Comments | 1 |
| Primary Language | JavaScript |
|
@infinitcodeai are there more efficient or simpler alternatives worth considering? |
|
Based on the PR context, here are simpler and more efficient alternatives: π§ Current Implementation Issues
π οΈ Simpler & Safer Alternatives
π Revised Implementation Conceptconst fs = require('fs');
function searchItems(searchParams) {
const keyword = searchParams.term; // Direct usage
fs.appendFileSync('queries.log', `${keyword}\n`); // Safe logging
return database.filter(item =>
item.name.includes(keyword) // Simple substring match
);
}βοΈ Tradeoffs Considered
This approach solves the same problem with equivalent functionality while eliminating all critical security risks and unnecessary complexity. π¦ Context details
|
|
@infinitcodeai are docs, comments and changelogs updated so future developers know what changed and why? |
|
Based on the PR review and file changes: π Documentation Status
π Key Documentation Gaps
π Recommended Additions// Add above route declaration
/**
* @swagger
* /search:
* get:
* summary: Search items by keyword
* parameters:
* - in: query
* name: term
* schema:
* type: string
* required: true
* description: Unsanitized search term (SECURITY CRITICAL - must escape)
*/
router.get('/search', itemController.searchItems);// Add at top of file
// SECURITY WARNING: User input passes through multiple risk layers:
// 1. Potential command injection (via execSync)
// 2. ReDoS vulnerabilities (via RegExp construction)
// 3. Debug info leakage (via error handling)β Action Items
Without these, future developers might reintroduce the same vulnerabilities during maintenance. π¦ Context details
π¦ Context details
|
|
@infinitcodeai thank you! |
|
You're welcome! π Let me know if you need:
Happy to dive deeper whenever you're ready. Just tag π¦ Context details
|
No description provided.