Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
18 changes: 9 additions & 9 deletions site/news/2025-05-12-weekly-progress-summary.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
---
title: Weekly Summary - May 12, 2025
title: Weekly Summary May 12, 2025
authors:
- will
tags: [progress, update, weekly]
---

This week, the team made significant progress on simulation improvements, trace verification, and comprehensive analysis of Leios transaction processing capacity.
This week, the team made significant progress on simulation improvements, trace verification, and a comprehensive analysis of Leios' transaction processing capacity.

### Trace verification

Expand All @@ -15,17 +15,17 @@ This week, the team made significant progress on simulation improvements, trace
- [Valid traces](https://github.com/input-output-hk/ouroboros-leios/blob/main/leios-trace-verifier/examples/valid/)
- [Invalid traces](https://github.com/input-output-hk/ouroboros-leios/blob/main/leios-trace-verifier/examples/invalid/)
- Integrated the trace verifier into Nix infrastructure and CI builds
- Removed deterministic conformance testing in favor of trace-based approach.
- Removed deterministic conformance testing in favor of a trace-based approach.

### Simulation improvements

#### Haskell simulation
- Conducted an informal review assessing code quality, design, and implementation
- Analyzed the simulation organization and identified areas for future improvement
- Found that most prospective changes to the Leios protocol would only involve a small fraction of the codebase
- Determined that addition of memory pool and transactions would take approximately 100-200 hours of labor.
- Determined that adding memory pool and transactions would take approximately 100-200 hours of labor.

The review of the Haskell simulator was documented in detail in [PR#353](https://github.com/input-output-hk/ouroboros-leios/pull/353), covering statistics, organization, code quality, design, implementation, and documentation aspects of the simulator.
The review of the Haskell simulator was documented in detail in [PR#353](https://github.com/input-output-hk/ouroboros-leios/pull/353), covering its statistics, organization, code quality, design, implementation, and documentation aspects.

#### Rust simulation
- Added `tx-start-time` and `tx-stop-time` parameters to avoid effects of slow starts or sudden terminations on transaction analysis
Expand All @@ -35,13 +35,13 @@ The review of the Haskell simulator was documented in detail in [PR#353](https:/

- Relocated the original Leios report to avoid confusion, while preserving valuable background information
- Added partially-drafted technical reports on Haskell simulations to Nix and CI builds:
- [Ouroboros Leios Network Specification](https://github.com/input-output-hk/ouroboros-leios/blob/main/simulation/docs/network-spec/ReadMe.md)
- [Ouroboros Leios simulation: building confidence in the performance results](https://github.com/input-output-hk/ouroboros-leios/blob/main/simulation/docs/ReadMe.md)
- [Ouroboros Leios network specification](https://github.com/input-output-hk/ouroboros-leios/blob/main/simulation/docs/network-spec/ReadMe.md)
- [Ouroboros Leios simulation: building confidence in the performance results](https://github.com/input-output-hk/ouroboros-leios/blob/main/simulation/docs/ReadMe.md).

The team conducted higher excess-capacity simulations to evaluate transaction inclusion hypotheses. The transaction lifecycle simulations raised the question of whether duplication of transactions in IBs was starving other transactions from ever being included in an IB. To test this, simulations were run with IBs being produced at three times the normal rate, providing ample space for transaction duplication.
The team ran higher excess-capacity simulations to test hypotheses about transaction inclusion. The transaction lifecycle simulations raised the question of whether duplicated transactions in IBs were preventing other transactions from ever being included. The team ran simulations with IBs produced at three times the normal rate to test this, providing ample space for transaction duplication.

Detailed analysis showed that transaction loss persisted despite increased capacity, indicating that other factors are preventing transactions from reaching the ledger. The results are documented in:
- [Analysis overview](https://github.com/input-output-hk/ouroboros-leios/blob/main/analysis/sims/2025w20/)
- [Results at 1x IB capacity](https://github.com/input-output-hk/ouroboros-leios/blob/main/analysis/sims/2025w20/analysis1x.ipynb)
- [Results at 3x IB capacity](https://github.com/input-output-hk/ouroboros-leios/blob/main/analysis/sims/2025w20/analysis3x.ipynb)
- [Results at 3x IB capacity](https://github.com/input-output-hk/ouroboros-leios/blob/main/analysis/sims/2025w20/analysis3x.ipynb).

Loading