Skip to content

Conversation

@m7pr
Copy link
Contributor

@m7pr m7pr commented Feb 27, 2025

@m7pr m7pr requested a review from donyunardi February 27, 2025 15:27
@m7pr m7pr added the core label Feb 27, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 27, 2025

badge

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                      Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
--------------------------  -------  ------  -------  ---------------------------------------
R/tm_a_pca.R                    889     889  0.00%    139-1161
R/tm_a_regression.R             775     775  0.00%    178-1058
R/tm_data_table.R               201     201  0.00%    100-349
R/tm_file_viewer.R              172     172  0.00%    47-254
R/tm_front_page.R               144     133  7.64%    77-247
R/tm_g_association.R            346     346  0.00%    159-580
R/tm_g_bivariate.R              698     434  37.82%   331-826, 867, 978, 995, 1013, 1024-1046
R/tm_g_distribution.R          1117    1117  0.00%    156-1420
R/tm_g_response.R               369     369  0.00%    177-625
R/tm_g_scatterplot.R            734     734  0.00%    260-1098
R/tm_g_scatterplotmatrix.R      297     278  6.40%    198-532, 593, 607
R/tm_missing_data.R            1119    1119  0.00%    124-1420
R/tm_outliers.R                1045    1045  0.00%    163-1359
R/tm_t_crosstable.R             264     264  0.00%    163-475
R/tm_variable_browser.R         805     800  0.62%    89-1046, 1084-1267
R/utils.R                       151     135  10.60%   87-272, 302-338, 350-359, 364, 378-397
R/zzz.R                           2       2  0.00%    2-3
TOTAL                          9128    8813  3.45%

Diff against main

Filename      Stmts    Miss  Cover
----------  -------  ------  --------
TOTAL             0       0  +100.00%

Results for commit: ef9ade6

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Unit Tests Summary

  1 files  22 suites   2s ⏱️
144 tests 29 ✅ 115 💤 0 ❌
182 runs  67 ✅ 115 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit ef9ade6.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Unit Test Performance Difference

Test Suite $Status$ Time on main $±Time$ $±Tests$ $±Skipped$ $±Failures$ $±Errors$
shinytest2-tm_a_pca 💚 $120.61$ $-1.79$ $0$ $0$ $0$ $0$
shinytest2-tm_g_bivariate 💔 $74.05$ $+1.11$ $0$ $0$ $0$ $0$
shinytest2-tm_outliers 💔 $111.07$ $+2.44$ $0$ $0$ $0$ $0$
shinytest2-tm_t_crosstable 💔 $31.43$ $+1.21$ $0$ $0$ $0$ $0$
shinytest2-tm_variable_browser 💔 $56.16$ $+2.32$ $0$ $0$ $0$ $0$

Results for commit e6c3944

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Signed-off-by: Marcin <[email protected]>
@donyunardi
Copy link
Contributor

Let's not merge until I pushed tmg to CRAN.
The failures are for shinytest2, which are not blockers for CRAN release.

@donyunardi
Copy link
Contributor

I don't think we need to proceed with this PR.
As I noted here, there seems to be issue with parallel computing.

@donyunardi donyunardi closed this Apr 25, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 25, 2025
@insights-engineering-bot insights-engineering-bot deleted the sparkline@main branch July 27, 2025 04:07
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants