Skip to content

Conversation

@anmyachev
Copy link
Contributor

@anmyachev anmyachev commented Dec 17, 2024

The same way as for Triton benchmarks, let's see how it works.

Ref: #2510

https://github.com/intel/intel-xpu-backend-for-triton/actions/runs/12379668850 (upstream profiler)

@anmyachev anmyachev linked an issue Dec 17, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@anmyachev anmyachev marked this pull request as ready for review December 17, 2024 19:58
@anmyachev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@whitneywhtsang please take a look. It is also needed for #2484

Copy link
Contributor

@whitneywhtsang whitneywhtsang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@anmyachev
Copy link
Contributor Author

anmyachev commented Dec 17, 2024

LGTM assuming https://github.com/intel/intel-xpu-backend-for-triton/actions/runs/12379668850/job/34554329179 to pass.

It looks like we need to wait for a very long time (CI run hasn't even started), let's merge without waiting, I checked locally.

@anmyachev anmyachev merged commit 8d16f1c into main Dec 17, 2024
7 checks passed
@anmyachev anmyachev deleted the amyachev/record-function branch December 17, 2024 20:16
pbchekin added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Call RECORD_FUNCTION not only for IPEX on XeTLA benchmarks

3 participants