Skip to content

Conversation

@AlexeySachkov
Copy link
Contributor

This is a follow-up for #15162

There are no new tests added with this PR, because we already have this edge case covered by existing tests here:

buf_out1_access[index++] = std::exp(complex<double>(1e6, -0.1));

But we don't have a Windows machine with a GPU which supports fp64 and therefoere this edge case went unnoticed by our CI. The change was locally tested in the right environment.

Patch-By: Justin Cai [email protected]

This is a follow-up for intel#15162

There are no new tests added with this PR, because we already have this
edge case covered by existing tests here:

https://github.com/intel/llvm/blob/3e98b3a09254863423f82d10aa7d40a8b64dbdd3/sycl/test-e2e/DeviceLib/std_complex_math_fp64_test.cpp#L202

But we don't have a Windows machine with a GPU which supports `fp64` and
therefoere this edge case went unnoticed by our CI. The change was
locally tested in the right environment.

Patch-By: Justin Cai <[email protected]>
@againull againull merged commit c9dde00 into intel:sycl Sep 24, 2024
13 checks passed
@AlexeySachkov AlexeySachkov deleted the private/asachkov/fix-exp-complex-edge-case-fp64-win branch September 25, 2024 08:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants