Skip to content

Conversation

AlexeySachkov
Copy link
Contributor

Extended build containers action with an extra argument which specifies a password that will be assigned to the sycl_ci user created within containers.

For now this new secret is unused, so this changes is expected to have no impact on our CI.

This is outlined from #16361 to improve testing for that PR: for security reasons actions are only invoked from the default branch and never from a PR branch. Therefore, to actually test that this secret is properly used without errors we need to update the action first.

Extended build containers action with an extra argument which specifies
a password that will be assigned to the `sycl_ci` user created within
containers.

For now this new secret is unused, so this changes is expected to have
no impact on our CI.

This is outlined from intel#16361 to improve testing for that PR: for
security reasons actions are only invoked from the default branch and
never from a PR branch. Therefore, to actually test that this secret is
properly used without errors we need to update the action first.
@AlexeySachkov AlexeySachkov requested a review from a team as a code owner December 16, 2024 17:48
AlexeySachkov added a commit to AlexeySachkov/llvm that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
@AlexeySachkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

All CI failures are expected. I will proceed with merge and will monitor post- and pre-commit to see if something unexpected happened.

@AlexeySachkov AlexeySachkov merged commit 6af4e4e into intel:sycl Dec 17, 2024
16 of 23 checks passed
@AlexeySachkov AlexeySachkov deleted the private/asachkov/pass-sycl-passwd-to-build-container branch December 17, 2024 09:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants