Skip to content

[SYCL] Tentative fix for properties_kernel_device_has_warning.cpp #19658

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: sycl
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

HPS-1
Copy link
Contributor

@HPS-1 HPS-1 commented Jul 31, 2025

No description provided.

@HPS-1 HPS-1 temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock July 31, 2025 14:24 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@HPS-1 HPS-1 temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock July 31, 2025 15:18 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@HPS-1 HPS-1 temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock July 31, 2025 15:18 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@HPS-1 HPS-1 marked this pull request as ready for review August 4, 2025 10:20
@HPS-1 HPS-1 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 4, 2025 10:20
@HPS-1 HPS-1 requested a review from maarquitos14 August 4, 2025 10:20
@maarquitos14
Copy link
Contributor

@HPS-1 what does tentative mean here? Are we working on a better long-term solution and use this provisionally?

@@ -85,6 +82,7 @@ template <typename T> struct K_funcIndirectlyUsingFP16 {
template <typename T> struct K_funcIndirectlyUsingFP16_Warn16 {
T *Props;
K_funcIndirectlyUsingFP16_Warn16(T Props_param) { Props = &Props_param; };
// expected-warning-re@+2 {{function '{{.*}}' uses aspect 'fp16' not listed in its 'device_has' property}}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the compiler producing the warning two times now?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Applies to all the changes.

@maarquitos14 maarquitos14 self-requested a review August 4, 2025 13:36
Copy link
Contributor

@maarquitos14 maarquitos14 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I meant to comment, not approve.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants