Skip to content
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/commands/addServerNamespaceToWorkspace.ts
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ export async function addServerNamespaceToWorkspace(resource?: vscode.Uri): Prom
const params = new URLSearchParams(uri.query);
const project = params.get("project");
const csp = params.has("csp");
const name = `${project ? `${project} - ` : ""}${serverName}:${namespace}${csp ? " web files" : ""}${
const name = `${project ? `${project} - ` : ""}${serverName}:${namespace}${!csp ? "" : ["", "/"].includes(uri.path) ? " web files" : ` web files (${uri.path})`}${
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we make the names shorter? How about server:NS (Web) and server (app/path)? We should change the project one to server:NS (project) as well to match.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Like this?

image

Seems OK as long as I don't have a project named "Web"

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like that better, but I think we can remove the namespace when we're tied to a specific web app. IMO that extra info isn't worth the space in that case. I see what you mean with the potential web and project conflict. Do you want to leave the "web files" suffix then? I doubt that conflict will come up in reality but it could be confusing for a user if it does.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about this?

image

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm having second thoughts about the change we've made to how a project folder gets named. Some people might not like how the project name is demoted. Here's the old way:

image

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, I forgot that the project used to come first! I agree, let's put that back.

scheme == FILESYSTEM_READONLY_SCHEMA && !project ? " (read-only)" : ""
}`;
// Append it to the workspace
Expand Down