-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
feat(auth): cache password policy per-app in validatePassword #8779
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
gyula-s
wants to merge
5
commits into
invertase:main
Choose a base branch
from
gyula-s:feat(auth)--validatePassword-cache-passwordPolicy-to-reduce-server-usage
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+436
−26
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b45e3eb
feat(auth): cache password policy per-app in validatePassword
gyula-s 58b68b6
feat(auth): match Firebase JS SDK password policy caching behavior
gyula-s 24e3ca1
feat(auth): implement password policy mixin for caching and validation
gyula-s 00db812
feat(auth): update validatePassword to include modular method call ar…
gyula-s e5223ed
feat(auth): remove module.exports for fetchPasswordPolicy function
gyula-s File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,269 @@ | ||
| /* | ||
| * Copyright (c) 2016-present Invertase Limited & Contributors | ||
| * | ||
| * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | ||
| * you may not use this library except in compliance with the License. | ||
| * You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
| * | ||
| * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
| * | ||
| * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
| * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
| * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
| * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
| * limitations under the License. | ||
| * | ||
| */ | ||
|
|
||
| import { jest, describe, it, expect, beforeEach } from '@jest/globals'; | ||
|
|
||
| const mockPasswordPolicy = { | ||
| schemaVersion: 1, | ||
| customStrengthOptions: { | ||
| minPasswordLength: 8, | ||
| maxPasswordLength: 100, | ||
| containsLowercaseCharacter: true, | ||
| containsUppercaseCharacter: true, | ||
| containsNumericCharacter: true, | ||
| containsNonAlphanumericCharacter: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| allowedNonAlphanumericCharacters: ['!', '@', '#', '$', '%'], | ||
| enforcementState: 'ENFORCE', | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const mockFetchPasswordPolicy = jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(mockPasswordPolicy); | ||
|
|
||
| jest.unstable_mockModule('../lib/password-policy/passwordPolicyApi', () => ({ | ||
| fetchPasswordPolicy: mockFetchPasswordPolicy, | ||
| })); | ||
|
|
||
| describe('validatePassword', () => { | ||
| let validatePassword; | ||
| let mockAuth; | ||
|
|
||
| beforeEach(async () => { | ||
| jest.resetModules(); | ||
|
|
||
| mockFetchPasswordPolicy.mockClear(); | ||
mikehardy marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| mockFetchPasswordPolicy.mockResolvedValue(mockPasswordPolicy); | ||
|
|
||
| jest.unstable_mockModule('../lib/password-policy/passwordPolicyApi', () => ({ | ||
| fetchPasswordPolicy: mockFetchPasswordPolicy, | ||
| })); | ||
|
|
||
| const modular = await import('../lib/modular/index.js'); | ||
| validatePassword = modular.validatePassword; | ||
|
|
||
| // Create a mock auth instance that mimics FirebaseAuthModule | ||
| mockAuth = { | ||
| app: { | ||
| name: '[DEFAULT]', | ||
| options: { apiKey: 'test-api-key-default' }, | ||
| }, | ||
| _tenantId: null, | ||
| _projectPasswordPolicy: null, | ||
| _tenantPasswordPolicies: {}, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const { PasswordPolicyImpl } = await import('../lib/password-policy/PasswordPolicyImpl.js'); | ||
|
|
||
| mockAuth._getPasswordPolicyInternal = function () { | ||
| if (this._tenantId === null) { | ||
| return this._projectPasswordPolicy; | ||
| } | ||
| return this._tenantPasswordPolicies[this._tenantId]; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| mockAuth._updatePasswordPolicy = async function () { | ||
| const response = await mockFetchPasswordPolicy(this); | ||
| const passwordPolicy = new PasswordPolicyImpl(response); | ||
| if (this._tenantId === null) { | ||
| this._projectPasswordPolicy = passwordPolicy; | ||
| } else { | ||
| this._tenantPasswordPolicies[this._tenantId] = passwordPolicy; | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| mockAuth._recachePasswordPolicy = async function () { | ||
| if (this._getPasswordPolicyInternal()) { | ||
| await this._updatePasswordPolicy(); | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| mockAuth.validatePassword = async function (password) { | ||
| if (!this._getPasswordPolicyInternal()) { | ||
| await this._updatePasswordPolicy(); | ||
| } | ||
| const passwordPolicy = this._getPasswordPolicyInternal(); | ||
|
|
||
| if (passwordPolicy.schemaVersion !== 1) { | ||
| throw new Error( | ||
| 'auth/unsupported-password-policy-schema-version: The password policy received from the backend uses a schema version that is not supported by this version of the SDK.', | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return passwordPolicy.validatePassword(password); | ||
| }; | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| describe('caching behavior', () => { | ||
| it('should fetch password policy on first call', async () => { | ||
| await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'Password123$'); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); | ||
| expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(mockAuth); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('should use cached policy on subsequent calls for same auth instance', async () => { | ||
| await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'Password123$'); | ||
| expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); | ||
|
|
||
| await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'AnotherPassword1!'); | ||
| expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); | ||
|
|
||
| await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'YetAnother1@'); | ||
| expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('should cache at project level when tenantId is null', async () => { | ||
| mockAuth._tenantId = null; | ||
|
|
||
| await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'Password123$'); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(mockAuth._projectPasswordPolicy).not.toBeNull(); | ||
| expect(Object.keys(mockAuth._tenantPasswordPolicies).length).toBe(0); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('should cache separately per tenant', async () => { | ||
| // First tenant | ||
| mockAuth._tenantId = 'tenant-1'; | ||
| await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'Password123$'); | ||
| expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); | ||
|
|
||
| // Same tenant should use cache | ||
| await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'AnotherPassword1!'); | ||
| expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); | ||
|
|
||
| // Different tenant should fetch again | ||
| mockAuth._tenantId = 'tenant-2'; | ||
| await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'Password123$'); | ||
| expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); | ||
|
|
||
| // Back to first tenant should use its cache | ||
| mockAuth._tenantId = 'tenant-1'; | ||
| await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'Password123$'); | ||
| expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); | ||
|
|
||
| // Verify both tenant policies are cached | ||
| expect(mockAuth._tenantPasswordPolicies['tenant-1']).toBeDefined(); | ||
| expect(mockAuth._tenantPasswordPolicies['tenant-2']).toBeDefined(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('should keep project and tenant caches separate', async () => { | ||
| // Project level (no tenant) | ||
| mockAuth._tenantId = null; | ||
| await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'Password123$'); | ||
| expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); | ||
|
|
||
| // Tenant level | ||
| mockAuth._tenantId = 'tenant-1'; | ||
| await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'Password123$'); | ||
| expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); | ||
|
|
||
| // Back to project level should use project cache | ||
| mockAuth._tenantId = null; | ||
| await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'Password123$'); | ||
| expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); | ||
|
|
||
| // Verify both caches exist | ||
| expect(mockAuth._projectPasswordPolicy).not.toBeNull(); | ||
| expect(mockAuth._tenantPasswordPolicies['tenant-1']).toBeDefined(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('should return correct validation status using cached policy', async () => { | ||
| const status1 = await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'Password123$'); | ||
| expect(status1.isValid).toBe(true); | ||
|
|
||
| const status2 = await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'weak'); | ||
| expect(status2.isValid).toBe(false); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| describe('schema validation', () => { | ||
| it('should throw error on unsupported schema version', async () => { | ||
| const unsupportedPolicy = { | ||
| ...mockPasswordPolicy, | ||
| schemaVersion: 2, | ||
| }; | ||
| mockFetchPasswordPolicy.mockResolvedValueOnce(unsupportedPolicy); | ||
|
|
||
| await expect(validatePassword(mockAuth, 'Password123$')).rejects.toThrow( | ||
| 'auth/unsupported-password-policy-schema-version', | ||
| ); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('should accept schema version 1', async () => { | ||
| const validPolicy = { | ||
| ...mockPasswordPolicy, | ||
| schemaVersion: 1, | ||
| }; | ||
| mockFetchPasswordPolicy.mockResolvedValueOnce(validPolicy); | ||
|
|
||
| const status = await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'Password123$'); | ||
| expect(status.isValid).toBe(true); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| describe('cache invalidation', () => { | ||
| it('should refresh cache when _recachePasswordPolicy is called with existing cache', async () => { | ||
| // First call caches the policy | ||
| await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'Password123$'); | ||
| expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); | ||
|
|
||
| // Simulate cache invalidation | ||
| await mockAuth._recachePasswordPolicy(); | ||
| expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('should not fetch when _recachePasswordPolicy is called without existing cache', async () => { | ||
| // No prior validation, so no cache exists | ||
| await mockAuth._recachePasswordPolicy(); | ||
| expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('should refresh correct tenant cache on invalidation', async () => { | ||
| // Cache for tenant-1 | ||
| mockAuth._tenantId = 'tenant-1'; | ||
| await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'Password123$'); | ||
|
|
||
| // Cache for tenant-2 | ||
| mockAuth._tenantId = 'tenant-2'; | ||
| await validatePassword(mockAuth, 'Password123$'); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); | ||
|
|
||
| // Invalidate tenant-1 cache | ||
| mockAuth._tenantId = 'tenant-1'; | ||
| await mockAuth._recachePasswordPolicy(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Should have fetched again for tenant-1 | ||
| expect(mockFetchPasswordPolicy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(3); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| describe('input validation', () => { | ||
| it('should throw error for null password', async () => { | ||
| await expect(validatePassword(mockAuth, null)).rejects.toThrow( | ||
| "firebase.auth().validatePassword(*) expected 'password' to be a non-null or a defined value.", | ||
| ); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('should throw error for undefined password', async () => { | ||
| await expect(validatePassword(mockAuth, undefined)).rejects.toThrow( | ||
| "firebase.auth().validatePassword(*) expected 'password' to be a non-null or a defined value.", | ||
| ); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.