Lower memory footprint and packet pool #666
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
guvenc
approved these changes
Apr 15, 2025
Collaborator
guvenc
left a comment
guvenc
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I conquer to decrease the memory footprint without losing functionality based on test results and the calculation you presented.
Could you please also rebase to main ?
PlagueCZ
force-pushed
the
feature/mempool_size_computation
branch
from
1455c90 to
965d181
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implemented the mentioned equation to compute packet pool size.
Tested in OSC with telementry monitoring available packets via
echo "/mempool/info,mbuf_pool" | dpdk-telemetry.py.Changes are in line with the issue description:
Fixes #665