Draft: Test action updates #1211
Conversation
WalkthroughAll edited GitHub Actions workflows switch action references from a pinned commit SHA to the tag test-update. No step logic, inputs, or conditions were changed, except for removing an inline version comment in dependency-review. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10–15 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (5)
.github/workflows/maven-release.yml (1)
32-66: Critical workflow using test-update tag for release operations.The security implications are particularly concerning for release workflows that handle sensitive operations like Maven Central publishing and GitHub releases.
Release workflows require the highest security standards because they:
- Handle signing keys (
SIGN_KEY_PASS,GPG_PRIVATE_KEY)- Publish to external registries (Maven Central)
- Create official releases and artifacts
- Use organization secrets (
sonatype_username,sonatype_password)Using mutable
test-updatetags in this context significantly increases supply chain attack surface..github/workflows/npm-release.yml (1)
39-76: NPM release workflow equally critical for security.Similar to Maven release, this workflow handles NPM publishing with organization secrets and creates official releases.
The workflow uses sensitive tokens (
NPM_TOKEN) and publishes to public registries. Any compromise of thetest-updatetag could lead to supply chain attacks affecting downstream consumers..github/workflows/codeql.yml (1)
43-83: Security analysis workflow compromised by tag-based pinning.CodeQL workflows are critical security infrastructure - they scan code for vulnerabilities. Compromising these workflows could blind security monitoring.
Security scanners process files from repositories and some include features that can execute code during configuration, creating opportunities for attackers to abuse legitimate tools to gain code execution in the pipeline.
If the
test-updatetag is compromised, attackers could:
- Disable security scanning
- Hide malicious code from detection
- Access security scan results and sensitive data
.github/workflows/maven-node-build.yml (1)
24-40: Pin action refs to immutable commit SHAs — 'test-update' tag is missingGH API returned 404 for it-at-m/lhm_actions refs/tags/test-update. The workflow references @test-update (mutable and non-existent), creating supply-chain risk and a broken action reference.
- Replace all @test-update refs in .github/workflows/maven-node-build.yml (lines 24–40) with commit SHAs (recommended) or a verified, permanent release tag that actually exists.
- Verify the action repo ref (e.g., via GitHub API) before merging.
.github/workflows/deploy-docs.yml (1)
29-31: Gate deploy step to push on main; PRs should not attempt deployment.Comment says “Only deploy … from the main branch” but there’s no if guard. Without it, PR runs may attempt deploy and fail or, worse, misconfigure pages if the action lacks internal gating.
Apply:
- id: deploy_docs # Only deploy documentation from the main branch to prevent unauthorized changes - uses: it-at-m/lhm_actions/action-templates/actions/action-deploy-docs@test-update + if: github.event_name == 'push' && github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' + uses: it-at-m/lhm_actions/action-templates/actions/action-deploy-docs@<commit-sha> # test-update
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
.github/workflows/actionlint.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/codeql.yml(4 hunks).github/workflows/dependency-review.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/deploy-docs.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/dockercompose-healthcheck.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/maven-node-build.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/maven-release.yml(3 hunks).github/workflows/npm-release.yml(3 hunks).github/workflows/pr-labeler.yml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/deploy-docs.yml (1)
27-27: Pin GitHub Action to an exact commit SHA (do not use mutable tagtest-update)Mutable tags weaken supply-chain security and reproducibility — replace the tag with the exact 40‑char commit SHA.
File: .github/workflows/deploy-docs.yml:27
- uses: it-at-m/lhm_actions/action-templates/actions/action-build-docs@test-update + uses: it-at-m/lhm_actions/action-templates/actions/action-build-docs@<commit-sha> # test-updateVerification note: resolving
test-updatewithgh api repos/it-at-m/lhm_actions/git/ref/tags/test-updatereturned 404 (Not Found). Obtain the SHA locally with one of:gh api repos/it-at-m/lhm_actions/git/ref/tags/test-update --jq '.object.sha' git ls-remote https://github.com/it-at-m/lhm_actions refs/tags/test-update | cut -f1
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| steps: | ||
| - uses: it-at-m/lhm_actions/action-templates/actions/action-actionlint@9767179088fd2e344d1a24c17404ab809a60f1b6 # v1.0.20 | ||
| - uses: it-at-m/lhm_actions/action-templates/actions/action-actionlint@test-update |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consistent pattern: commit SHA to test-update tag migration.
This follows the same pattern across all workflows, reducing security posture by moving from immutable commit references to mutable tags.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/actionlint.yml around line 13: the workflow uses a mutable tag
"it-at-m/lhm_actions/action-templates/actions/action-actionlint@test-update",
which weakens security by replacing an immutable commit SHA with a tag; change
the ref to the specific commit SHA used previously (or another immutable SHA)
instead of the tag so the action points to a fixed commit (replace the
"@test-update" suffix with the full commit SHA for that action).
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| steps: | ||
| - uses: it-at-m/lhm_actions/action-templates/actions/action-dependency-review@9767179088fd2e344d1a24c17404ab809a60f1b6 # v1.0.20 | ||
| - uses: it-at-m/lhm_actions/action-templates/actions/action-dependency-review@test-update |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Dependency review workflow security reduction.
Even security-focused workflows like dependency review are affected by this change.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/workflows/dependency-review.yml around line 10, the workflow
currently references an unstable/test tag
("it-at-m/lhm_actions/action-templates/actions/action-dependency-review@test-update")
which reduces security guarantees; replace that reference with a stable, trusted
release (for example use the official GitHub dependency review action like
github/dependency-review-action@v1 or pin the third‑party action to a specific,
verified tag or commit SHA) so the workflow runs a known, auditable version.
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| steps: | ||
| - uses: it-at-m/lhm_actions/action-templates/actions/action-dockercompose-healthcheck@9767179088fd2e344d1a24c17404ab809a60f1b6 # v1.0.20 | ||
| - uses: it-at-m/lhm_actions/action-templates/actions/action-dockercompose-healthcheck@test-update |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick
Lower risk but still follows concerning pattern.
While this workflow has lower impact (healthcheck only), it continues the pattern of reducing security guarantees.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/workflows/dockercompose-healthcheck.yml around line 12, the workflow
references an external action via a non-upstream ref
(it-at-m/lhm_actions/action-templates/actions/action-dockercompose-healthcheck@test-update)
which reduces supply-chain security; change the action reference to a vetted
source by either (1) using the official upstream action repository and pinning
to a specific commit SHA (not a branch or ephemeral tag), or (2) replacing with
an equivalent action from the GitHub Actions Marketplace with a pinned SHA;
update the ref to the chosen commit SHA and document the source in a comment so
the workflow uses an immutable, reviewed action.
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| steps: | ||
| - uses: it-at-m/lhm_actions/action-templates/actions/action-pr-labeler@9767179088fd2e344d1a24c17404ab809a60f1b6 # v1.0.20 | ||
| - uses: it-at-m/lhm_actions/action-templates/actions/action-pr-labeler@test-update |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Action pinning security concern applies here as well.
Same security implications as noted in other workflows - moving from pinned commit SHA to test-update tag reduces security guarantees.
Pull Request
Changes
Reference
Issue: #XXX
Checklist
Note: If some checklist items are not relevant for your PR, just remove them.
General
I have read the Contribution Guidelines (TBD)Code
console.log), see code quality toolingFrontend / WebComponent
package.json(if dependencies were changed)Backend / EAI
pom.xml(if Camel version was bumped)Development Stack
Screenshots (if UI was changed)
Summary by CodeRabbit