-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
Possible Invalid iat fix #503
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
| KeyLike: TypeAlias = ECKey | RSAKey | OKPKey | SYMKey | ||
| SerializationFormat = Literal["compact", "json"] | ||
|
|
||
| JWT_REGEX = r'^[A-Za-z0-9-_]+\.[A-Za-z0-9-_]+\.[A-Za-z0-9-_]+$' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not sure that it might work with an SD-JWT
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this case the signed request is always a simple JWS.
I can also add a proper function in the sd-jwt package if you want.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this helper used also for SD-JWT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At this moment this function is used exclusively to do the check for the signed request.
pyeudiw/satosa/frontends/openid4vci/endpoints/pushed_authorization_request_endpoint.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…tion_request_endpoint.py Co-authored-by: Giuseppe De Marco <[email protected]>
Resolves #498