-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Home
Nilay Vishwakarma edited this page Jun 6, 2025
·
7 revisions
A flexible finite state machine (FSM) library for .NET written in C#, it is designed to create and manage Finite State Machines (FSMs) in a simple and efficient way. It allows developers to define states, transitions, and events, enabling the modeling of complex behaviors in a structured manner.
- State Management: Easily define and manage states in your FSM. Strongly-typed FSMs using enums for states
- Transition Handling: Transition conditions and side effects.
- Serialization: Serialization to/from JSON and YAML.
- Builder Pattern: Builder pattern for easy FSM construction.
- Extensible: Easily extend the library to fit specific needs or integrate with other systems.
- Cross-Platform: Multi-targeted for broad .NET compatibility
Using a finite state machine (FSM) for managing state offers several advantages over ad-hoc approaches (like scattered conditionals, flags, or event-driven code) and even over some object-oriented state patterns. Here are the key benefits:
- Clarity and Explicitness
- All possible states and transitions are explicitly defined.
- The system’s behavior is easy to visualize, reason about, and document.
- Reduces ambiguity and hidden state changes.
- Predictability and Robustness
- Transitions are controlled and validated.
- Only allowed transitions can occur, preventing invalid or unexpected state changes.
- Makes it easier to handle edge cases and errors.
- Maintainability
- Adding or modifying states and transitions is straightforward.
- Changes are localized to the FSM definition, not scattered across the codebase.
- Reduces the risk of introducing bugs when requirements change.
- Testability
- FSMs are easy to test.
- You can systematically test all states and transitions.
- Makes it easier to write unit tests for state-dependent logic.
- Separation of Concerns
- State logic is separated from business logic.
- Conditions and side effects are encapsulated, making the codebase cleaner and more modular.
- Scalability
- FSMs scale well as complexity grows.
- Adding new states or transitions does not exponentially increase code complexity, unlike nested if/else or switch statements.
- Visualization and Documentation
- FSMs can be visualized as state diagrams.
- This aids in communication with stakeholders and helps onboard new developers.
| Approach | Pros of FSM over this approach |
|---|---|
| If/else, switch | Avoids spaghetti code, centralizes state logic |
| Flags/booleans | Prevents invalid state combinations |
| Event-driven | Makes allowed transitions explicit and predictable |
| State pattern | FSM is more declarative and easier to visualize |
Here are some common use cases for implementing a finite state machine (FSM) in software development:
- Workflow and Process Management
- Example: Ticketing systems, order processing, approval workflows.
- Why: Each item moves through a series of well-defined states (e.g., Open → In Progress → Resolved).
- User Interface (UI) Navigation
- Example: Wizard dialogs, multi-step forms, menu navigation.
- Why: UI components often have distinct states and transitions based on user actions.
- Game Development
- Example: Character states (Idle, Walking, Jumping, Attacking), enemy AI behaviors.
- Why: Game entities often have clear, rule-based state transitions.
- Protocol and Communication Handling
- Example: Network protocol implementations (TCP handshake, HTTP request/response), parsers.
- Why: Protocols are defined by sequences of states and transitions based on received data.
- Device and Hardware Control
- Example: Embedded systems, robotics, IoT devices (e.g., a washing machine: Idle → Washing → Rinsing → Spinning → Done).
- Why: Devices operate in modes with strict rules for moving between them.
- Authentication and Authorization Flows
- Example: Login processes, multi-factor authentication, session management.
- Why: Security flows require strict control over allowed transitions.
- Error Handling and Recovery
- Example: Retry logic, circuit breakers, transaction management.
- Why: Systems need to move between normal, error, and recovery states in a controlled way.
- Text Parsing and Lexical Analysis
- Example: Tokenizers, interpreters, compilers.
- Why: Parsing often involves moving through states based on input characters or tokens.