Skip to content

Conversation

@javadev
Copy link
Owner

@javadev javadev commented Oct 14, 2025

No description provided.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 14, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (099e616) to head (7c8ede5).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                main      #787   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
  Complexity      1596      1596           
===========================================
  Files              6         6           
  Lines           4555      4555           
  Branches         834       834           
===========================================
  Hits            4555      4555           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@javadev
Copy link
Owner Author

javadev commented Oct 14, 2025

What problem does this code solve?
Removed appveyor integration.

Does the code still compile with Java 11?
Yes

Risks
Low

Changes to the API?
No

Will this require a new release?
No

Should the documentation be updated?
No

Does it break the unit tests?
No

Was any code refactored in this commit?
No

Review status
APPROVED

Starting 3-day comment window

@javadev javadev changed the title Remove appveyor Removed appveyor Oct 14, 2025
@javadev javadev merged commit 381a31a into main Oct 16, 2025
37 of 55 checks passed
@javadev javadev deleted the javadev-patch-1 branch October 16, 2025 06:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant