-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
Add new BOUNDS_CHECK GatherScatterMode #33446
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @jakevdp, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a new Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new BOUNDS_CHECK mode for GatherScatterMode. This is a valuable addition that will help catch out-of-bounds indexing errors at compile time for static indices. The implementation is well-integrated across the relevant parts of JAX, including lax.slicing, numpy.indexing, and ops.scatter. The fallback behavior to FILL_OR_DROP when static checking is not possible is sensible. The new functionality is also thoroughly tested.
I've made a couple of minor suggestions to use tuples instead of lists for in checks for consistency across the codebase. Overall, this is a great change.
2cee99e to
880428d
Compare
880428d to
b0837a7
Compare
No description provided.