Skip to content

Conversation

Tosinibikunle
Copy link

resolves #740

Copy link
Member

@2ykwang 2ykwang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR! @Tosinibikunle

I’m currently a bit busy with work, so I’ll be able to do a full review this weekend.

In the meantime, could you please:

  • Confirm whether the mismatch error occurs in get_for_objects (from the issue description, it seems to be triggered in the “IN query”)
  • Check if the same issue also happens in get_for_object
  • Add a test case that covers this scenario

@hramezani
Copy link
Member

Also add a changelog entry

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 12, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.88%. Comparing base (9ef8cf2) to head (d630437).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #746      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.81%   95.88%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          34       34              
  Lines        1194     1190       -4     
==========================================
- Hits         1144     1141       -3     
+ Misses         50       49       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@hramezani
Copy link
Member

@2ykwang could you review it again?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

django.db.utils.ProgrammingError: operator does not exist: character varying = bigint
3 participants