Fix: Include routes without RouteInstances when no filter is applied on maps #124
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
Routes that don't have any RouteInstances were completely hidden from map displays when no filters were applied. This occurred because the map data query started with the
RouteInstancestable, which meant only routes with at least one RouteInstance would ever be included in the results.For example, if a user created a new route but hadn't recorded any trips (RouteInstances) on it yet, that route would be invisible on the map unless specific filters were applied.
Solution
Modified
RoutesOdataController.GetGeoJsonAsync()to handle filtered and unfiltered scenarios differently:When filters are applied (
q.Filter != null):When no filters are applied (
q.Filter == null):Routestable directly instead ofRouteInstancestotalInstancespropertytotalInstances = 0Example
Before this fix:
After this fix:
Impact
Routes without any recorded trips are now visible on the map when no filters are applied, improving the overall usability of the route management system.
Warning
Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses (expand for details)
I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:
192.168.178.30/home/REDACTED/work/OVDB/OVDB/OV_DB/bin/Debug/net9.0/OV_DB(packet block)If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:
Original prompt
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.