This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 16, 2024. It is now read-only.
Fix for wrong alternate key exception#520
Open
jaanraadik wants to merge 1 commit intojordimontana82:masterfrom
Open
Fix for wrong alternate key exception#520jaanraadik wants to merge 1 commit intojordimontana82:masterfrom
jaanraadik wants to merge 1 commit intojordimontana82:masterfrom
Conversation
Currently, when a match isn't found for an alternate key, the exception "The requested key attributes do not exist for the entity {record.LogicalName}" is thrown as line 63 is missing a 'throw'. I would expect line 63's exception to be raised in this circumstance
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently, when a match isn't found for an alternate key, the exception "The requested key attributes do not exist for the entity {record.LogicalName}" is thrown as line 63 is missing a 'throw'. I would expect line 63's exception to be raised in this circumstance