-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
feat: development process v2 with alignment verification and patterns #314
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Process engineering overhaul for parallel orchestration: - Add docs/patterns/ with 5 canonical code examples (bulk ops, services, TUI, CLI, connection pooling) - Add required plan structure for alignment verification at planning phase - Enhance /orchestrate with full lifecycle (spawn → merge), dashboard view - Add /refine-process command for meta-monitoring signals - Create ADR-0031 documenting process decisions - Add terminology.md with shared vocabulary (sessions, agents, states) - Enhance /review-bot-comments with Review Agent categorization - Add GitHub labels: needs-design, designed, ready, in-progress, pr-ready, blocked - Update CLAUDE.md with plan citation and scope boundary rules Key principle: verify alignment at planning (cheap), not PR review (expensive). The Zen Model: monitor gates (entry/exit), not the autonomous zone. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <[email protected]>
Summary of ChangesHello @joshsmithxrm, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly refines the development process by formalizing the interaction between human developers and AI agents. It introduces a more structured approach to planning and review, provides clear code patterns for consistency, and enhances the automation of the development lifecycle. The goal is to improve efficiency, reduce rework, and ensure higher quality output through better alignment and focused human oversight. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a significant overhaul of the development process, codenamed V2. It adds a new ADR (ADR-0031) to document the process, which includes alignment verification through structured planning and the introduction of canonical code patterns. The orchestrator workflow is enhanced to cover the full development lifecycle, and a new /refine-process command is added for continuous improvement. My review focuses on ensuring consistency across the new documentation and correctness in the new code patterns. I've found some inconsistencies in terminology definitions across several new documents and a couple of bugs in the bulk operations code pattern. Overall, this is a fantastic set of improvements for standardizing and scaling development.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR introduces Development Process V2, a comprehensive framework for human-AI collaboration focused on alignment verification at planning gates and canonical code patterns. It adds ADR-0031 to document the process decisions, creates five pattern files demonstrating architectural standards, enhances the orchestrator workflow with full lifecycle management, and standardizes terminology across all workflow documentation.
Changes:
- Adds ADR-0031 documenting Development Process V2 with the "gates model" for human oversight
- Creates canonical code patterns in
docs/patterns/for bulk operations, services, TUI panels, CLI commands, and connection pools - Enhances orchestrator and worker workflows with planning verification, PR lifecycle management, and Review Agent integration
- Introduces
/refine-processcommand for iterative process improvement based on repeated feedback signals
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 13 out of 13 changed files in this pull request and generated 7 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| docs/adr/0031_DEVELOPMENT_PROCESS_V2.md | Documents the Development Process V2 with alignment verification, gates model, and meta-monitoring |
| docs/patterns/bulk-operations.cs | Pattern for parallel bulk operations with connection pool usage |
| docs/patterns/service-pattern.cs | Pattern for service layer with IProgressReporter and PpdsException |
| docs/patterns/connection-pool-pattern.cs | Pattern for connection pool acquisition in parallel loops |
| docs/patterns/cli-command-pattern.cs | Pattern for CLI commands with output routing and exception handling |
| docs/patterns/tui-panel-pattern.cs | Pattern for TUI panels with Terminal.Gui layout and async updates |
| .claude/workflows/terminology.md | Defines shared vocabulary for sessions, agents, lifecycle, and gates |
| .claude/workflows/autonomous-session.md | Adds required plan structure for alignment verification |
| .claude/commands/start-work.md | Updates to require pattern citations in worker plans |
| .claude/commands/orchestrate.md | Enhances with full PR lifecycle including post-approval mechanics |
| .claude/commands/review-bot-comments.md | Updates with Review Agent categorization framework |
| .claude/commands/refine-process.md | New command for lightweight process refinement |
| CLAUDE.md | Adds rules requiring plan citations and scope boundaries |
- Fix markdown anchor links in refine-process.md - Add partial failure handling in bulk-operations pattern (CreateMultipleResponse) - Add failed record aggregation in sequential execution path - Add NOTE disclaimers clarifying patterns are illustrative, not exact APIs - Cast CreateMultipleResponse properly for accessing Responses collection Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <[email protected]>
Summary
docs/patterns/for bulk operations, services, TUI panels, CLI commands, and connection pools/refine-processskill for process improvement based on repeated feedback signalsTest plan
Closes #311
🤖 Generated with Claude Code