-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
Updated UFC ADC/Pot circuit & replaced obsolete parts #1171
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Introduced a +2V5 voltage reference circuit using ADR5040ARTZ and supporting components. Added a new 5V I2C pin header (J13). Updated net assignments and component placements to support the new reference and header. Minor changes to silkscreen and attributes for several footprints. Co-Authored-By: Sandra Carroll <[email protected]>
Added TP20 (3V3) and TP21 (2V5) test points to the UFC_Main PCB and updated corresponding net segments. Also fixed minor silkscreen and code formatting issues in the PCB layout and schematic files. Removed auto-saved files from the project directory. Co-Authored-By: Sandra Carroll <[email protected]>
Replaced obsolete 100k 0402 resistors and N-Channel MOSFETS in power circuit. Generated JLCPCB manufacturing package. Generated 3D STEP file. Co-Authored-By: Sandra Carroll <[email protected]>
Schematic notes updated to specify display package, and CPL/GERBER/PDF files regenerated to reflect these changes and copied to release folder.
|
Great work Noctum! Thank you so much! I've ignored the display section since that part was already approved but will doublecheck the PWR circuited. For my understanding the 2.048V reference voltage is a bit over engineered. Back then I've tested the circuit on a breadboard and sent Sandra a demo code to proofe that a 3.3V source on the pots is absolutely dueable. However doing it your way doesn't hurt at all but have you tested the circuit in real life? If not I would volunteer to order some ADR5040 and perform some breadboard tests. Scuba |
|
I did try the code you sent, same issue. with a 3v3 source it knob in the sim was at full rotation when the physical knob was at 3/4 rotation. so they do not match |
|
I did not test with the Ref, I supplied 2.048 v from my PSU and it worked as intended. |
|
@kbastronomics, yes , I can remember that we didn't agree on this topic and had different results. I don't want to revive our discussion since a desicion had already been made. (thanks anyways for our constructive discourse) I hope we agree that all changes should be tested with 1:1 components. I'll order the necessary parts for the ADC changes but would be happy to have a second pair of eyes to approve it as well. Is there anything left to test? |
Thanks @SCUBA82 - don't mind the double check on that circuit real world. The other thing was the 2x N-Channels in the power circuit - Sandra blessed off on my replacements, but just a third party confirming I selected adequate replacements would be great. The more warm and fuzzies, the better. WAS: https://jlcpcb.com/partdetail/MATSUKI-ME2328G/C709746 |
|
just to recap what was done on testing the ADC, that was fully tested and custom DCS-BIOS code written for it (some may remember some of my questions around dcs-bios callbacks I was having issues with, it was for this). it was tested stand alone and it was tested with a 2.048v source the power circuit went thru multiple simulation to verify functionality. the MOSFETS replaced were as close as available components would allow. key items, logic level mosfets, n-channel, higher current handling, RDSon was simulair not exact but should not be a issue in this circiut |
Regenerated manufacturing files due to a BOM/CPL mismatch.
|
We should still NOTE: DO NOT BUILD, TESTING until we're ready to turn it over to our members |
|
Test PCBs have been ordered, and as Sandra says, do not build until we fully vet them. I'll sit on this PR until it is built and tested. I feel confident enough to test, so here we go. |
|
Parts have arrived, hope I'll find some time for the breadboard circuit till next weekend |
|
Test UFC PCBs are enroute along with testing of the power circuit for the pots. |
Description
Addresses #1120
Motivation and Context
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Screenshots
How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration:
Checklist: (Delete non-relevant sections)
PCB/ECAD: